Low Back Pain in Adolescent Athletes: Etiology, Clinical Evaluation, Conservative Management and Return to Sport Considerations- A Narrative Review

Uroš Živković Orcid logo ,
Uroš Živković
Contact Uroš Živković

University of Belgrade – Faculty of Sports and Physical Education , Belgrade , Serbia

Đorđe Hadži Pavlović Orcid logo ,
Đorđe Hadži Pavlović

University of Belgrade – Faculty of Organizational Sciences , Belgrade , Serbia

Miloš Drljan Orcid logo
Miloš Drljan

University of Belgrade – Faculty of Sports and Physical Education , Belgrade , Serbia

Editor: Danilo Radanović

Published: 11.10.2026.

Volume 18, Issue 2 (2026)

https://doi.org/10.31382/20261207

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition in adolescent athletes and an important cause of training interruption. Its prevalence varies across sports and appears to be influenced by age, training load, biomechanical demands, and underlying pathology. Both non-specific and specific causes should be considered. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of the etiology, clinical evaluation, conservative management and return-to-sport considerations in adolescent athletes with low back pain. Publications in English language from January 2016 to April 2026 were identified through PubMed, supplemented by Google Scholar and reference-list screening; 27 publications were included in the clinical synthesis, supplemented by contextual sources. Non-specific low back pain is commonly associated with muscular, biomechanical, and training-related factors, whereas spondylolysis is commonly reported as one of the most frequent specific diagnoses. Lumbar disc herniation and other less common conditions, including Scheuermann disease, apophyseal ring injuries, and sacroiliac joint dysfunction, should also be considered in the differential diagnosis. Clinical evaluation includes history taking, physical and neurological examination, and imaging when indicated. Conservative management remains the first-line approach in most cases and is based on activity modification, exercise-based rehabilitation, correction of biomechanical deficits, and gradual progression toward sport-specific activity. Because the clinical presentation and recovery process may differ depending on the underlying diagnosis and management, return-to-sport decisions should be individualized and based on symptom resolution, functional recovery, and sport-specific readiness, rather than on time alone. However, evidence for return-to-sport criteria in adolescent athletes remains limited.

Keywords

References

Arampatzis, A., Frank, J., Laube, G., & Mersmann, F. (2019). Trunk muscle strength and lumbo‐pelvic kinematics in adolescent athletes: Effects of age and sex. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 29(11), 1691–1698. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13503
Arampatzis, A., Laube, G., Schroll, A., Frank, J., Bohm, S., & Mersmann, F. (2020). Perturbation‐based exercise for prevention of low‐back pain in adolescent athletes. Translational Sports Medicine, 4(1), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.191
Cucchiaro, G., Francis, C., Householder, K., & Fernandez, A. (2022). Sacroiliac joint pain in adolescents: Diagnostic and treatment challenges. Paediatric and Neonatal Pain, 4(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12080
Dal Farra, F., Arippa, F., Carta, G., Segreto, M., Porcu, E., & Monticone, M. (2022). Sport and non-specific low back pain in athletes: a scoping review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00609-9
Donald, S., Burelle, S., & Tracey, J. (2024). Perceptions and Experiences of Psychological Readiness During the Return to Sport After Injury. Journal for Advancing Sport Psychology in Research, 4(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.55743/000024

Citation

Funding Statement

This review received no funding.

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles