More articles from Volume 11, Issue 2, 2019
Preliminary study on pre-treatment physical activity and quality of life in infertility
Physical activity and screen time among children and adolescents in Kazakhstan
Influences of occupational therapy as curricular activity on to psychophysical development of hearing-impaired students
Gotta catch’em all: ready, set, (pokemon) GO!
Isokinetic performance of shoulder external and internal rotators in judo and karate female elite athletes
E-sports: Definition and social implications
University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia,
Institute of Social Sciences “Ivo Pilar”, Zagreb, Croatia,
Abstract
The development of video games can be traced back to the 80s of the last century. The final phase of the gaming industry’s development brought with it another phenomenon — e-sport. “Electronic sport” presupposes playing video games in a competitive setting, with emphasis on increased “institutionalization” of gaming activity through the organization of e-sports teams and official international competitions. In order to define esports, it’s important to note that not every activity of playing video games can be described as e-sport, but every e-sport is essentially playing video games. The interest for the phenomenon of electronic sport has increased over the past several years in all social sciences, including sociology. This paper aims to present several dimensions of the “electronic sport” phenomenon, review the existing research in this field, compare various aspects of e-sports and “traditional” sports, and discuss the formation of new subcultural group gathered around video games. The key task of this paper is to examine the distance between e-sports and “traditional” sport and frame the socio-economic scale of the phenomenon.
References
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
