Previous studies indicate that there is a large influence of the starting reaction time (RT) on sprint performance, but also that some recent changes in athletic rules may affect this correlation. This study aimed to examine the relationship between RT and results in: men’s (M60mH) and women’s (W60mH) disciplines 60 m over hurdles, 60 m hurdles in the heptathlon (H), 60 m hurdles in the pentathlon (P) at the recently held World Indoor Championship 2022 (WIC). The aim was also to determine whether there are differences in RT between M60mH and W60mH, M60mH and H, W60mH, and P, and between H and P. The study included 170 competitors who competed at the WIC. Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (r) was used for correlation analysis, and the t-test for independent samples was used to examine differences between groups. A statistically significant correlation (r=0.23, N=72, p=0.05) was found between the results and RT in W60mH when observing the entire sample of participants (r2 = 5.29). Considering that in H (r=0.42, N=10, p=0.23, r2=0.18) and P (r=0.54, N=12, p=0.07, r2=0.29), a much higher correlation was obtained between results and RT than in competitors in the 60 m hurdles event, we believe that this is a consequence of different athletic rules that refer to a false start. There are no significant differences between RT for M60mH and W60mH, M60mH and H, W60mH, and P, and between H and P. Coaches should pay attention to developing all parts of the sprint race, including the reaction time.
References
1.
Babić V, Delalija A. Reaction time trends in the sprint and hurdle events at the 2004 Olympic Games: Differences between male and female athletes. New Studies in Athletics. 2009. p. 59–68.
2.
Brosnan K, Hayes K, Harrison A. Effects of false-start disqualification rules on responsetimes of elite-standard sprinters. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2017. p. 929–35.
3.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
4.
Collet C. Strategic aspects of reaction time in world-class sprinters. Perceptual and motor skills. 1999. p. 65–75.
5.
Der G, Deary I. Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychology and aging. 2006. p. 62–73.
6.
Freeman W. Track & Field Coaching Essentials. Human Kinetics. 2015.
7.
Greenhouse I, King M, Noah S, Maddock R, Ivry R. Individual differences in resting corticospinal excitability are correlated with reaction time and GABA content in motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2017. p. 2686–96.
8.
Gürses V, Kamis O. The Relationship between Reaction Time and 60M Performance in Elite Athletes. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018. p. 64–9.
9.
Gutiérrez-Dávila M, Dapena J, Campos J. The effect of muscular pre-tensing on the sprint start. Journal of applied biomechanics. 2006. p. 194–201.
10.
Haugen T, Shalfawi S, Tønnessen E. The effect of different starting procedures on sprinters’ reaction time. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2013. p. 5209–14.
11.
Janssen S. The determinants of reaction times: influence of stimulus intensity. 2015.
12.
Kuang S. Is reaction time an index of white matter connectivity during training? Cogn. Neurosci. 2017. p. 126–8.
13.
Martin D, Buonscristiani J. Influence of reaction time on athletic performance. New Studies in Athletics. 1995. p. 67–79.
14.
Michel S, Jarver J. The start is (almost) everything in sprint performance. Track Coach. 2002. p. 5121.
15.
Mitašík P, Doležajová L, Lednický A, Végh D. Changes in the start reaction times in the 200 m run at the world championships after the tightening of false start rule. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae. 2020. p. 207–16.
16.
Nashed J, Crevecoeur F, Scott S. Rapid online selection between multiple motor plans. Journal of Neuroscience. 2014. p. 1769–80.
17.
Ntolaptsis K, Panoutsakopoulos V. Relationship Between Reaction Time, Medal Winning and Performance in the 60 m Hurdle Indoor Event Before and After the Change of False Start Rule. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae. 2021. p. 72–85.
18.
Pavlović R. The importance of reaction time in athletics: Influence on the results of sprint runs of World Championships finalists. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine. 2021. p. 53–65.
19.
Pavlović R, Raković A, Idrizović K, Mihajlović I. Differences in the time of start reaction and achieved results in the sprint disciplines in the finals of the world championship in Moscow. Facta universitatis-series: Physical Education and Sport. 2013. p. 285–97.
20.
Pilianidis T, Kasabalis A, Mantzouranis N, Mavvidis A. Start Reaction Time and Performance at the Sprint Events in the Olympic Games. Kinesiology. 2012. p. 67–72.
21.
Sant’ana J, Franchini E, Da Silva V, Diefenthaeler F. Effect of fatigue on reaction time, response time, performance time, and kick impact in taekwondo roundhouse kick. Sport Biomech. 2016. p. 201–9.
22.
Stevenson M. The sprint start. Coach and Athletic Director. 1997. p. 18–21.
23.
Tønnessen E, Haugen T, Shalfawi S. Reaction time aspects of elite sprinters in athletic world championships. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013. p. 885–92.
24.
Widodo A. Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities. Atlantis Press; 2023. p. 99–105.
25.
Winter E, Brookes F, Matić M, Mrdaković V. Relationship between reaction time and performance in the 60 m hurdles at the 2022 World Indoor Championships. Exercise and Quality of Life. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology. APA; 1991. p. 11–8.
26.
Matić M, Mrdaković V. Relationship between reaction time and performance in the 60 m hurdles at the 2022 World Indoor Championships. Exercise and Quality of Life. 2023. p. 11–8.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
