The present study was designed to evaluate the anthropometric parameters, body composition and anaerobic power components of elite male and female basketball players and compare them in relation to gender and specific sport demands. The study group consisted of 43 elite national level athletes: 22 male basketball players (aged 20.3±2.92) and 21 female players (aged 19.5±2.96). The significant differences were noted in fat body mass, triceps and lower body region skinfolds, wigh higher values in females, while higher values of forearm, upper arm and waist circumference were noted in males. Comparing Wingate test parameters, higher values of absolute anaerobic power, explosive power, and absolute anaerobic capacity were recorded in male players, while there was no significant difference in relative anaerobic power, and relative anaerobic capacity values between genders. Morphometric profile in elite sport should accompany physiological profile in order to monitor improvements during training process and sport performance.
Ackland TR, Lohman TG, Sundgot-Borgen J, Maughan RJ, Meyer N. Current status of body composition assessment in sport: Review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I. Vol. 42, O. C. Medical Commission. Sports Med. p. 227–49.
2.
Angyan L, Teczel T, Zalay Z, I K. Relationship of anthropometrical, physiological and motor attributes to sport-specific skills. Vol. 90, Acta Physiologica Hungarica. p. 225–31.
3.
Bar-Or O. Wingate anaerobic test: An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Vol. 4, Sports Med. p. 381–94.
4.
Ben Abdelkrim N, El Fazaa S, El Ati J. Time-motion analysisand physiological data of elite under-19-year-old basketballplayers during competition. Vol. 41, Br. J. Sports Med. p. 69–75.
5.
Carter JE, Ackland TR, Kerr DA, Stapff AB. Somatotype and size of elite female basketball players. Vol. 23, Journal of Sports Science. p. 1057–63.
6.
Carvajal W, Betancourt H, León S, Deturnel Y, Martínez M. Kinanthropometric Profile of Cuban Women Olympic Volleyball Champions. Vol. 14, MEDICC Review. p. 16–22.
7.
Coelho E, Silva MJ, Figueiredo AJ, Moreira CH, RM M. Functional capacities and sport-specific skills of 14 to 15-year-old male basketball players: Size and maturity effects. Vol. 8, European Journal of Sport Science. p. 277–85.
8.
Cormery B, Marcil M, Bouvard. Rule change incidence on physiological characteristics of elite basketball players: a 10-year-period investigation. Vol. 42, Brit J SportMed. p. 25–30.
9.
Gaurav V, Singh M, S S. Anthropometric characteristics, somatotyping and body composition of volleyball and basketball players. Vol. Man,1(3):28, J PhysEdu Sport. p. 32.
10.
Hoffman T, G. M, CM. KWJ. Relationship between athletic performance tests and playing time in elite college basketball players. Vol. 10, J Strength Conditioning Res. p. 67–71.
11.
International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; The University of South Australia, School of Physical Education. Exercise and Sport Studies. International Standards for anthropometric assessment.
12.
Jakovljević S, Karalejić M, Pajić Z, Gardašević B, R M. The influenc of anthropometric characteristics on the agility abilities of the 14-year old elite male basketball players.Physical Education and Sport. Vol. 9. p. 149.
13.
Kalinski M, Norkowski H, Kerner M. Anaerobic Power Characteristics of Elite Athletes in National Level Team-Sport Games. Vol. 2, Eur J Sport Sci.
14.
Kerr DA, Ackland TR, Schreine r AB. The elite athlete: Assessing body shape, size, proportion and composition. Vol. 4, Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. p. 25–9.
15.
Kovač M, Jurak G, Leskošek B. The prevalence of excess weight and obesity in Slovenian children and adolescents from 1991 to 2011. Vol. 18, Anthropological Notebooks. p. 91–103.
16.
Malina RM. Body composition in athletes: Assessment and estimated fatness. Vol. 26, Clin Sports Med. p. 37–68.
17.
Massuça L, Fragoso I. Study of Portuguese handball players of different playing status.(2011). A morphological and biosocial perspective. Vol. 28, Biology of Sport. p. 37–44.
18.
Maud PJ, Foster C. Physiological Assessment of.
19.
Ostojic S, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball; Physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. Vol. 20, J Strength Cond Res. p. 740–4.
20.
Pelin C, Kurkcuoglu A, Ozener B, Yazici AC. Anthropometric characteristics of young Turkish male athletes. Vol. 33, CollAntropol. p. 1057–63.
21.
Pojskic H, Separovic V, Uzicanin MM, S. Morphological Differences of EliteBosnian Basketball Players According to Team Position Int. Vol. 32, J. Morphol. p. 694,.
22.
Reilly T, Bancsbo J. Franks A.(2000). Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer. Vol. 18, Journal of Sports Sciences. p. 669–68.
23.
Rodriguez NR, Marco NM, Langley S. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Vol. 41, Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. p. 731.
24.
Sallet P, Perrier D, Ferret JM, Vitelli V, Baverel G. Physiological differences in professional basketball players as a function of playing position and level of play. Vol. 45, J Sports Med Phys Fitness. p. 291–4.
25.
Vuckovic I, Mekic M. Morfological characteristics of basketball players from playing position aspect.In 1st International Scientific Conference.Exercise and Quality of Life.Proceedings book.
26.
Wilmore JH. Body composition and athletic performance. In: Nutrition and Athletic Performance. p. 15875.
27.
Organization WH. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. In: Report of a WHO consultation World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser,894:i-xii,1-253.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
