Psychometric properties of Bull’s Mental Skills Questionnaire in a Turkish population

Bülent O. Miçooğullari Orcid logo ,
Bülent O. Miçooğullari

Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Physical Education and Sport Department, Nevşehir, Turkey,

David J. Edwards ,
David J. Edwards

University of Zululand, Psychology Department, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa,

Rıdvan Ekmekçi Orcid logo
Rıdvan Ekmekçi

Pamukkale University, Sport Science Faculty, Sports Management Department, Denizli, Turkey,

Published: 01.12.2020.

Vol 13, No 2 (2021), 2021, 13 (2);

pp. 13-20;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.211202

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the reliability and validity of Bull’s Mental Skills Questionnaire (BMSQ), measuring seven psychological skills resulting in a total scale score, within Turkey. The sample consisting of 163 males and 131 females, totaling 294 athletes, completed the 28 item BMSQ. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were undertaken. EFA results yielded a satisfactory seven-factor solution, the same as the English version. Cronbach alpha (α) reliability indices were as follows: concentration ability (0.71), anxiety and worry management (0.63), relaxation ability (0.69), imagery ability (0.73), self-confidence (0.72), motivation (0.64) and mental preparation (0.52). The BMSQ explained 62% of the total variance. Moreover, model fit indices calculated during CFA for the 28 item and 7 sub-dimensions model of BMSQ indicated an acceptable fit [Chi-Square (ꭓ²)=541.2, df=328, ꭓ²/df=1.65, Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA)=0.05, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.95, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI)=0.90, Normed Fit Index (NFI)=0.89, and Non Normed Fit Index (NNFI)=0.90]. Thus, the original 7-factor solution was supported with the data collected from Turkish participants. Results demonstrated that the BMSQ is a valid and reliable instrument for the Turkish population.

References

1.
Bull S, Albinson J, Shambrook C. The mental game plan. Getting psyched for sport. Sports Dynamics; 1996.
2.
Buscombe R, Edwards D, Steyn B. Use of and relationships between mental skills in South African and United Kingdom university students. Poster presented at the 16 th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science. 2011.
3.
Chartrand J, Jowdy D, Danish S. The Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tool. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1992. p. 18–9.
4.
Edwards S, Edwards D. The description and evaluation of a breath based psychological skills training program for health and sport. African Journal for Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. 2012. p. 380–99.
5.
Edwards D, Steyn B. The establishment of norms for the Bull’s mental skills questionnaire in South African university students: An exploratory study. African Journal for Physical Health Education, Recreation and Dance. 2011. p. 526–34.
6.
Edwards D, Steyn B, Buscombe R. Mental skills in South African undergraduate university students: An exploratory study. Poster presented at the 13 th. European Congress of Sport Psychology; 2011.
7.
Erhan S, Güler M, Ağduman F, Gerek Z. Ottawa Mental Ability Assessment Scale-3 Turkish validity and reliability study. Journal of Kafkas Education Researches. 2015. p. 33–9.
8.
Jaccard J, Wann C. LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage Publications; 1996.
9.
Kruger A, Edwards D, Edwards S. Basics of structural equation modeling. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance. Sage; 2015. p. 612–8.
10.
Moran A. Conceptual and methodological issues in the measurement of mental imagery skills in athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1993. p. 156.
11.
Nelson D, Hardy L. The development of an empirically validated tool for measuring psychological skill in sport. Journal of Sport Science. 1990. p. 71.
12.
Öcal K. Predicting employee performance in nonprofit sport organizations: The role of managerial and financial performance and the mediating role of support for innovation and individual creativity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. 2011.
13.
Özcan V, Günay M. The Turkish adaptation of Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28 (ACSI-28): The validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise. 2017. p. 130–6.
14.
Sanchez X, Lesyk J. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Sport Psychology. Christodoulidi; 2001. p. 85–6.
15.
Smith R, Smoll F, Cumming S. Effects of a motivational climate intervention for coaches on children’s sport performance anxiety. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2007. p. 39–59.
16.
Smith R, Schitz R, Smoll F, Ptacek J. Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of sport-specific psychological skills: The athletic coping skills inventory-28. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1995. p. 379–98.
17.
Smith R, Christensen D. Psychological skills as predictors of performance and survival in professional baseball. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1995. p. 399–415.
18.
Snauwaert E. Presented at the 10 World Congress of Sport Psychology. 2001.
19.
Tammen V, Murphy S, Asilomar C, Tenenbaum G, Eklund R. Communication to the Annual Meeting of the North American Society of Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity. John Wiley; 1990.
20.
Vealey S. Handbook of sport psychology. Wiley; 2007.
21.
Weinberg R, Gould D. Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Human Kinetics; 2014.
22.
White S, Edwards B, Ekmekçi D, R. The relationship between psychological skills, experience, and practice commitment among collegiate male and female skiers. Exercise and Quality of Life. 1993. p. 13–20.
23.
Mla: Miçooğullari, Bülent O, David J, Edwards R, Ekmekçi. Psychometric properties of Bull’s Mental Skills Questionnaire in a Turkish population. Exercise and Quality of Life. 2021. p. 13–20.
24.
Chicago: Miçooğullari, Bülent O, David J, Edwards R, Ekmekçi. Psychometric properties of Bull’s Mental Skills Questionnaire in a Turkish population. Exercise and Quality of Life. 2021. p. 13–20.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles