Differences in the achievement motivation in young football players and non-athletes

Milan Jelić
Milan Jelić

University of Novi Sad, Association of Centers for Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies and Research, Novi Sad, Serbia

Published: 15.12.2018.

Volume 10, Issue 2 (2018)

pp. 5-12;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.181201

Abstract

There was lot of previous researches about achievement motivation, but also not lot of comparisons between young footballers and nonfootballers. This article intends to improve psychological way of working with young sportsmen and help to coaches how to approach in positive way to young person. The main objective of this research was to determine the differences in the level of achievement motivation at boys age 10-14 years (N=200) in relation with sport status, school success and economic characteristics who were divided into 2 subsamples: who are/or not engaged in football. In this study, for data collection the MOP2002 scale was used (Franceško, Mihić, & Bala, 2002). For the purpose of data processing in this study were used methods of descriptive and multivariate statistics (t-test, canonical discriminant analysis, F-test). Application of canonical discriminant analysis which showed that the discriminating canonical correlation function of 0,39 (λ= 0.86; χ2 = 22.40; r = 0.00), which means there is a statistically significant difference regarding the structure of the achievement motivation. The results of the research indicate that engagement in football by an individual causes the higher level of the achievement motivation, with the most pronounced contribution by the component “persistence in achieving goals”, and then “goals achievement as a source of satisfaction”. Also, the  results show that the economic status of the family didn’t contribute to differences in achievement motivation of their children, and difference in the school success of the respondents is followed by level of its motivation. 

Keywords

References

Arkes, H., & Garske, J. (1977). Psychological theories of motivation.
Bačanac, L. (2008). Psychological characteristics of children and youth.
Barić, R., & Bucik, V. (2009). Motivational Differences in Athletes Trained by Coaches of Different Motivational and Leadership Profiles. Kineziologija, 181–194.
Bong, M. (2009). Age-related differences in children’s goal orientations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 879–876.
Chicago, :, & Jelić, M. (2018). Differences in the achievement motivation in young football players and non-athletes. Exercise and Quality of Life, 2, 5–12.
Chiu, K., Nor Idayu, L., Najib Ahmad, M., Khor Poy, M., & H. (2014). Student-athletes’ Evaluation of Coaches’ Coaching Competencies and Their Sport Achievement Motivation. Review of European Studies, 2, 17–29.
Cox, R. (1988). Sports Psyhology, Concepts and Applications -Fourth edition.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. 85–107.
Duda, J., & Nicholls, J. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 290–299.
Ebbeck, V., & Becker, S. (1994). Psychosocial predictors of goal orientations in youth soccer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 4, 355–362.
Franceško, M., Mihić, V., & Bala, G. (2002). Personality in a Multicultural Society: Organizational Multiculturalism and European Identity. 134–143.
Gröpel, P., Wegner, M., Schüler, J., & J. (2016). Achievement motive and sport participation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 93–100.
Hassett, B. (2016). Rising Above: How 11 Athletes Overcame Challenges in Their Youth To Become Stars. School Library Journal, 4, 186–186.
Havelka, N., & Lazarević, L. (1981). Sports and personality.
Heckhausen, H. (1967). The anatomy of achievement motivation.
Kvaščev, R., & Radovanović, V. (1977). Impact of ability, position of personality traits and motivation to performance in school. Psychology, 31–73.
Mcclelland, D., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 4, 690–702.
Mcclelland, D., & Winter, D. (1969). Motivating economic achievement.
Milošević, Z., Maksimović, N., Milovanović, I., Matić, R., Jakšić, D., & Vuković, J. (2016). Socio-economic characteristics of families and physical activity of children. Exercise and Quality of Life, 2, 3–8.
Mla: Jelić, M. (2018). Differences in the achievement motivation in young football players and non-athletes. Exercise and Quality of Life, 5–12.
Mouloud, K., & Abd Elkader, B. (2016). Self-efficacy and Achievement Motivation among Football Player. The Swedish Journal of Scientific Research, 11, 13–19.
Murray, M. (1938). Explorations in Personality.
Prpa, N. (2017). Personality traits and gender effect on athletes and non-athletes selfhandicapping strategies over time. Exercise and Quality of Life, 1, 5–14.
Raftery, J., Grolnick, W., & Flamm, E. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. 343–364.
Schorer, J., Baker, J., Lotz, S., & Busch, D. (2010). Influence of early environmental constraints on achievement motivation in talented young handball players. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1, 42–57.
Schunk, D., Meece, J., & Pintrich, P. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. 4.
Simonović, M. (2003). The complexity of the structure of the relationship motivation -personality. Psychology Yearbook, 2, 200–213.
Simonović, M. (2004). A set of personality traits of medical school students. Psychology Yearbook, 3, 91–110.
Soyer, F., Sari, I., & Laurenţiu-Gabriel, T. (2014). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviour and achievement motivation: a research in football players. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 421–425.
Tubić, T. (2004). Psychology and sports.
Zuber, C., & Conzelmann, A. (2013). The impact of the achievement motive on athletic performance inadolescent football players. European Journal of Sport Science, 5, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.181201

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles