Influence of maternal level of education and socioeconomic status on maternal knowledge of nutrition, physical activity and children’s bodyweight of Nigerian school pupils

Adebisi I. Hammed ,
Adebisi I. Hammed

University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Benin City, Nigeria,

Suleiman O. Usman ,
Suleiman O. Usman

University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Benin City, Nigeria,

Onyemechi Ezekiel ,
Onyemechi Ezekiel

University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Benin City, Nigeria,

Joy C. Duru ,
Joy C. Duru

University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Benin City, Nigeria,

Oluwaseun J. Oladimeji ,
Oluwaseun J. Oladimeji

University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Benin City, Nigeria,

Ogolo Jirho
Ogolo Jirho

University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Benin City, Nigeria,

Published: 01.12.2020.

Vol 13, No 1 (2021), 2021, 13 (1);

pp. 39-44;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.210605

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of maternal level of education and socioeconomic status on maternal knowledge of nutrition, physical activity, and children’s body weight of Nigerian school pupils. A total of four hundred and twelve (412) primary school pupils participated in this study. A structured questionnaire was used to assess the maternal level of education, material’s knowledge of nutrition, and physical activities. Body height and body weight were measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer in meters and a bathroom weighing scale in kg, respectively. The children’s body weight was determined using the formula weight (kg)/height (m2). The children were then categorized into different classes of body mass index based on the recommendation of Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (2015), which is age and sex-specific for children and teens from two years old through 20 years. The differences in maternal educational qualification and children’s bodyweights were analyzed using the independent sample t-test. However, the influence of maternal SES on maternal knowledge of nutrition, physical activities, and children’s body weights were analyzed using ANOVA. Statistical significance was accepted for a p-value of <0.05. The outcome of this study showed that the educational qualification of mothers had a significant (p<0.05) influence on children’s bodyweights. It was also observed from this study that the maternal SES significantly (p<0.05) influenced maternal nutritional knowledge, maternal knowledge of physical activities, and children’s bodyweights. This study therefore concluded that the maternal level of education and SES do influence maternal knowledge of nutrition and physical activity as well as children’s bodyweights.

References

1.
Adnun N, Miniandy N. The relationship between Mother’s educational level and Feeding Practices among children in selected kindergartens, Selagar Malaysia: A cross-sectional study. Asian Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2012. p. 39–52.
2.
Anderson P, Black R, Victora C, Walker S, Bhutta Z, Christian P, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 427–51.
3.
Brown J, Broom D, H; Nicholson J, Bittman A. Do working mothers raise couch potato kids: maternal employment & children’s lifestyle behaviors and weight in early. Social science & Medicine. 2010. p. 1816–24.
4.
Caldwell J. Maternal Education as a factor in child Mortality. World Health Forum. 2008. p. 75–8.
5.
Carol S, Judith A, Chia Y. Maternal labor supply and childhood obesity in Canada: Evidence from the NLSCY. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2009. p. 217–44.
6.
Cole T, Bellizzi M, Flegal K, Dietz W. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. British Medical Journal. 2000. p. 1240–3.
7.
Davison K, Birch L. Childhood overweight: a contextual model and recommendations for obesity. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity. 2006. p. 159–69.
8.
Desai S, Alva S. Maternal education and child health: is there a strong causal relationship? Demography. 1998. p. 71–81.
9.
Fertig A, Glomm G, &tchernis R. The connection between maternal employment and childhood obesity: Inspecting the mechanisms. Review of Economics of the Household. 2009. p. 227–55.
10.
Hawkins S, Cole T, Law C. Maternal employment and early childhood overweight: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. International Journal of Obesity. 2008. p. 30–8.
11.
Hesketh K, Crawford D, Salmon J, Jackson M, Campbell K, Lazzeri G, et al. Relationship between 8/9-yr-Old School Children BMI, Parents’ BMI, and Educational Level: A Cross-Sectional Survey. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity. 2007. p. 76.
12.
Lioret S, Maire B, Volatier J, Charles M. Child Overweight in France and Its Relationship with Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Socioeconomic Status. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007. p. 509–16.
13.
Morrissey T. of growth in body mass index across childhood: Associations with and paternal employment. 2012.
14.
Morrissey T, Dunifon R, Kalil A. Maternal employment, work schedules, and children’s body mass index. Child Development. 2010. p. 66–81.
15.
Phipps S, Lethbridge L, Burton P. Long-run consequences of parental paid work hours for child overweight status in Canada. Social Science and Medicine. 2006. p. 977–86.
16.
Ruhm C. Maternal employment and adolescent development. Labour Economics. 2008. p. 958–83.
17.
Sanchez-Cruz J, De Ruiter I, Jimenez-Moleon J. Individual, family and environmental factors associated with pediatric excess weight in Spain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatrics. 2014. p. 3.
18.
Shakkwar E. Nutrition Knowledge Application. A senior thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for graduation in the honours program. Liberty University Spring; 2007.
19.
Shrewsbury V, Wardle J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Obesity. 2008. p. 275–84.
20.
Singh G, Kogan M, Van Dyck P, Siahpush M. Racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and behavioral determinants of childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: Analyzing Independent and Joint Associations. Annals of Epidemiology. 2008. p. 682–95.
21.
Stamatakis E, Primatesta P, Chinn S, Rona R, Falascheti E. Overweight and obesity trends from 1974 to 2003 in English children: what is the role of socioeconomic factors? Arch Dis Child. 2005. p. 999–1004.
22.
Taveras E, Gillman M, Kleinman K, Rich-Edwards J, &rifas-Shiman S. Racial/ethnic differences in early-life risk factors for childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2010. p. 686–95.
23.
Vereecken C, &maes L. Television viewing and food consumption in Flemish adolescents in Belgium. SozPraventivmed. 2006. p. 311–7.
24.
Vereecken C, Keukelier E, L. Influence of mother’s educational level on food parenting practices and food habits of young children. Appetite. 2004. p. 93–103.
25.
Wachs T, Creed-Kanashiro H, Cueto S, Jacoby E. Maternal education and intelligence predict offspring diet and nutritional status. Journal of Nutrition. 2005. p. 2179–86.
26.
10 facts on physical activity.Global Strategy on Diet, Physical activity & Health. WHO African Region Retrieved from www. World Health Organization; 2014.
27.
Youngson A, Usman S, Ezekiel O, Duru J, Oladimeji O, Jirho O, et al. Influence of maternal level of education and socioeconomic status on maternal knowledge of nutrition, physical activity and children’s bodyweight of Nigerian school pupils. Exercise and Quality of Life. Exercise and Quality of Life. 2004. p. 39–44.
28.
Hammed A, Suleiman O, Usman O, Ezekiel J, Duru, Oluwaseun J, et al. Influence of maternal level of education and socioeconomic status on maternal knowledge of nutrition, physical activity and children’s bodyweight of Nigerian school pupils. Exercise and Quality of Life. 2021. p. 39–44.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles