Motor performance of young soccer players depending on biological age

Miroslav Holienka ,
Miroslav Holienka

Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Department of Sports Games, Bratislava, Slovakia

Matej Babic ,
Matej Babic

Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Department of Sports Games, Bratislava, Slovakia

Ladislava Doležajová ,
Ladislava Doležajová

Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Department of Athletics, Bratislava, Slovakia

Peter Šelinger ,
Peter Šelinger

Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Department of Sports Kinanthropology, Bratislava, Slovakia

Eva Musilová
Eva Musilová

Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Department of Sports Kinanthropology, Bratislava, Slovakia

Published: 15.12.2017.

Volume 9, Issue 2 (2017)

pp. 19-23;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.171203

Abstract

The main purpose of our article was to broaden the knowledge of the level of the motor performance of young soccer players in puberty, taking into account their biological age. The object of our research was 18 soccer players in the U 15 category of the soccer club ŠK Slovan Bratislava divided into a subset with accelerated development (n=10) with body height 177,4 ± 5,1 cm, body weight 65,8 ± 7,5 kg and a subset with retarded development (n=8) with body height 170,9 ± 7,3 cm, body weight 63,9 ± 7,7 kg. To assess the motor performance, a set of 3 tests to evaluate speed and speed-coordination (agility) capabilities was applied. The set of tests contained a 10 m run (n=10 - average value of 1.61 s, n=8 - average value of 1.62 s), a 30 m run (n=10 - average value of 4.13 s, n=8 - average value of 4.16 s) and a 5 x 10 m run with a change of direction (n=10 - average value of 11.55 s, n=8 - average value of 11.70 s). Using the Mann-Whitney U test, we did not confirm in our case a statistically significant different level in the motor performance of the monitored sets with regard to the degree of their biological maturity. 

Keywords

References

Beunen, G., & Malina, R. (1996). The Child and Adolescent Athlete. 3–24.
Bratislava, S. (n.d.). FTVŠ UK.
Demcenco, A. (n.d.). Development of applicative coordination abilities of 12-13 years old pupils through basketball elements. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2, 527–532.
Dobisíková, M. (1999). Určovaní věku.
Doležajová, L., & Koštial, J. (2002). Vzťah biologického veku a úrovne pohybových schopností 10-11-ročných žiačok ZŠ. Optimalizácia zaťaženia v telesnej a športovej výchove (s. 36-42). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 4, 1069–1074.
Gómez-López, M. (2017). Relative age effect during the selection of young handball player. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 1, 418–423.
Havlíček, I., Šelingerová A Ramacsay, M., & L. (1989). Závislosť motorickej výkonnosti na biologickom veku. Teórie a Praxe tělesné výchovy. 12, 757–761.
Reiter, E., & Lee, P. (2002). Delayed puberty. Adolescent Medicene, 1, 101–118.
Šelingerová, M. (1992). Stanovenie biologického veku a jeho uplatnenie v športe.
Šelingerová, M., Havlíček A Moravec, I., & R. (1995). Biologický vek športovcov v puberte. Acta Facultatis, 1, 99–104.
Šelingerová, M., & Havlíček, I. (1992). Nové prístupy k skúmaniu v školskej telesnej výchove a športe. 106–110.
Šelingerová, M., & Šelinger. (2009). Výsledky somatických antropometrických výskumných meraní v oblasti mládežníckeho športu. 97–103.
Šelingerová, M., & Šelinger, P. (2004). Metodika určovania biologického veku zo somatických údajov u populácie predpubertálneho a pubertálneho veku.
Šelingerová, M., & Šelinger, P. (2005). Sledovanie rozvoja pohybových schopností a výkonnostného rastu športovo talentovaných detí a mládeže v závislosti od úrovne ich biologickej zrelosti. 88–92.
Tanner, J. (2001). Assessment of Skeletal Maturity and Prediction of Adult Height (TW3 Method).
Zapletalová, L. (1990). Telesný a funkčný rozvoj a pohybová výkonnosť 7-18 ročnej mládeže v ČSFR.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles