The aim of this research was to determine the effect of two different metric protocols, the present standard and a new protocol with a video demonstration of the task, on reliability and homogeneity of motor skills assessment tests for the students in primary education. The sample of participants comprised ofstudentsin the third and fourth grades from four elementary schools in the urban area of Petrinja and Sisak in Croatia. The total number of students that participated was 327, consisting of 186 boys and 141 girls aged 10.5 years. The students were divided in two subsamples, based on the protocol applied. The sample of variables consisted of 4 motor skills assessment tests: Shuttle-run, Partial Curl-up, 90° Pushups, Back-saver sit and reach.The results of metric characteristics of composite testing in the field of motor skills have shown a high level of reliability, homogeneity and sensitivity of tests after both protocols were applied. Based on the reliability coefficient, the test called 90°Push-ups can be used further by using the video demonstration protocol, with a few trials before the application, while the test called Partial Curl-updoes not allow the use and application of the test in this form and using this method. The research shows that, with correction of some tests, the new protocol with the video demonstration has better results of metric characteristics of tests compared to the standard protocol.
Aiken CA, Fairbrother JT& P, G P. The Effects of Self-Controlled Video Feedback on the Learning of the Basketball Set Shot.Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 3. p. 1–8.
2.
Al-Abood SA, Davids K &Bennett, S.J. Specificity of task constraints and effects of visual demonstrations and verbal instructions in directing learners’ search during skill acquisition. Vol. 33, Journal of Motor Behavior. p. 295–305.
3.
Atienza FL, Balaguer I, Garcia-Merita ML. Video modeling and imaging training on performance of tennis service of 9- to 12-year-old children. Vol. 87, Perceptual and Motor Skills. p. 519–29.
4.
BenitezSantiago AS. Using Video Feedback to Improve Martial-Arts Performance. Graduate Theses and Dissertations.College of Behavioral and Community Sciences.
5.
Boyer E, Miltenberger RG, Batsche C& F, V. Video modeling by experts with video feedback to enhance gymnastics skills. Vol. 42, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. p. 855–60.
6.
Božanić A. Vrednovanje i analiza razvoja motoričkih znanja u ritmičkoj gimnastici, Doktorska disertacija.
7.
Buchanan JJ& D, J N. Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice. Vol. 74, Psychological Research. p. 313–26.
8.
Bushnell EW, Boudreau JP. Motor development and the Mind: The Potential Role of Motor Abilities as a Determinant of Aspects of Perceptual Development. Vol. 64, Child Development. p. 1005–21.
9.
Cheraghidocheshmeh M, Mossavi Y, Noroozy D &Izadi, M. The comparison of effect of video-modeling and verbal instruction on the performance in throwing the discus and hammer. Vol. 1, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. p. 2782–5.
10.
Cliff DP, Okely AD, Smith LM &McKeen, K. Relationships between fundamental movement skills and objectively measured physical activity in preschool children. Vol. 21, Pediatric Execise Science. p. 436–49.
11.
Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal K, M., Dietz WH. Establishing standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. Vol. 320, British Medical Journal. p. 1–6.
12.
Doussoulin A, Rehbein L. Motor imagery as a tool for motor skill training in children. Vol. 7, Motricidade. p. 37–43.
13.
P.C.W. The effect of video-modeling and video-feedback on the learning of the tennis service by novices. Vol. 3, Journal of Sports Sciences. p. 127–38.
14.
Findak V, Metikoš D, Mraković M &Neljak, B. Primijenjena kineziologija u školstvu (Norme). Hrvatski pedagoško – književni zbor.
15.
Fisher A, Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, Montgomery C, Williamson A, Paton JY &Grant, et al. Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children. Medicine & Science in sport & execise. p. 684–9.
16.
Guadagnoli M, Holcomb W& D, M. The efficacy of video feedback for learning the golf swing. Vol. 20, Journal of Sports Sciences. p. 615–22.
17.
Hayes SJ, Hodges NJ, Scott MA, Horn RR& W, A.M. The efficacy of demonstrations in teaching children an unfamiliar movement skill: The effects of object-orientated actions and point-light demonstrations. Vol. 25, Journal of Sports Sciences. p. 5 ,559-575.
18.
Hodges NJ, Chua R& F, I.M. The role of video in facilitating perception and action of novel coordination movement. Vol. 35, Journal of Motor Behavior. p. 247–60.
19.
Hopkins WG. Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science. Vol. 30, Sports Medicine. p. 1–15.
20.
Horn RR, M. WA, Scott MA& H, N. Visual Search and Coordination Changes in Response to Video and Point- Light Demonstrations Without KR. Vol. 37, Journal Of Motor Behavior. p. 265–74.
21.
Jennings CT, Reaburn P &Rynne, S.B. The effect of self-modelling video intervention on motor skill acquisition and retention of novice track cyclist’s standing start performance. Vol. 8, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching.
22.
Jukić I, Vučetić V, Aračić M, Bok D, Dizdar D, Sporiš G &Križanić, et al. Dijagnostika kondicijske pripremljenosti vojnika, Kineziološki fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
23.
Kelley H. Using Video Feedback to Improve Horseback Riding Skills. Graduate Theses and Dissertations.College of Behavioral and Community Sciences.
24.
Laguna PL. Task complexity and sources of task-related information during the observational learning process. Vol. 26, Journal Of Sports Sciences. p. 1097–113.
25.
Magill RA. Modeling and verbal feedback influences on skill learning. Vol. 24, International Journal of Sport Psychology. p. 358–69.
26.
Magill RA, Schoenfelder-Zohdi B. A visual model and knowledge if performance as sours of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastic skill. Vol. 27, International Journal of Sport Psychology. p. 7–22.
27.
Malacko J, Popović D. Metodologija kineziološko antropoloških istraživanja. In: Priština: Fakultet za fizičku kulturu Univerziteta u Prištini.
28.
Malina R, Bouchard C &Bar O, O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity.
29.
Metikoš D, Hofman E, Prot F, Pintar Ž &Oreb, G. Mjerenje bazičnih motoričkih dimenzija sportaša. In: Zagreb: Fakultet za fizičku kulturu Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
30.
Miller G& G, C. Effects of Visual Aids on Acquisition of Selected Tennis Skills. Vol. 67, Perceptual and Motor Skills. p. 603–6.
31.
Mišigoj-Duraković M. Kinanthropology-biological aspects of physical exercise.
32.
The Influence of Familiarization on the Reliability of Force Variables Measured During Unloaded And Loaded Vertical Jumps. Vol. 19, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. p. 140–5.
33.
Momirović K, Štalec J &Wolf, B. Pouzdanost nekih kompozitnih testova primarnih motoričkih sposobnosti. Vol. 5, Kineziologija. p. 169–92.
34.
Mužić V. Metodologija pedagoškog istraživanja. Zavod za izdavanje udžbenika.
35.
Novak D. Razlike u kinatropološkim obilježjima učenika petog razreda u odnosu na makroregionalne i urbanoruralne značajke Republike Hrvatske, Doktorska disertacija.
36.
Parsons JL, Alexander MJL. Modifying spike jump landing biomehanics in female adolescent volleyball athletes using video and verbal feedback. Vol. 33, Research in Developmental Disabilities. p. 1076–86.
37.
J.P. P, Dawson L, Smith LM &Gasson, N. The role of early fine and gross motor development on later motor and cognitive ability. Vol. 27, Human movement science. p. 668–81.
38.
Prskalo I, Jenko S, Petračić T, Šerbetar I, Šuker D. Motor Skills of Boys and Girls at the Age of 9 and 10. In: 1st Special Focus symposium on Kinesiological Education in PreSchool and Primary Education. p. 95–101.
39.
Ram N, Riggs SM, Skaling S, Landers DM &McCullagh, P. A comparison of modelling and imagery in the acquisition and retention of motor skills. Vol. 25, Journal of Sports Science. p. 587–97.
40.
Raudsepp L, Pall P. The relationship betveen fundamental motor skills and outside-school physical activity of elementary school children. Vol. 18, Pediatric Execise Science. p. 426–35.
41.
Rodrigues ST, Ferracioli MC &Denardi, R.A. Learning a complex motor skill from video and poin-light demonstrations. Vol. 111, Perceptual and Motor Skills. p. 307–23.
42.
Scully DM& C, E. Observational learning in motor skill acquisition: A look at demonstrations. Vol. 19, Irish Journal of Psychology. p. 472–85.
43.
Sullivan KJ, Kantak SS &Burtner, P.A. Motor Learning in Children: Feedback Effects on Skill Acquisition. Vol. 88, Physical Therapy. p. 720–32.
44.
Influence of Multiple Administration of a Psychomotor Test on Performance and Learning.Journal of Strength and. Vol. 22, Conditioning Research. p. 1964–8.
45.
Vlahović L, Babin J, Bavčević T. Metric Characteristic and Basic Parameters of Distribution of Some Motoric Tests of Pupils in Primary Education. In: 1st Special Focus symposium on Kinesiological Education in PreSchool and Primary Education. p. 66–72.
46.
Vrbik I. Effects of different testing protocols on motor skill tests in primary education, Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
47.
Welk GJ, Meredith MD. Fitnessgram/Activitygram Test Administration Manual, Updated.
48.
Williams HG, Pfeiffer KA, Dowda M, Jeter C, Jones S &Pate, R.R. A FieldBased Testing Protocol for Assessing Gross Motor Skills in Preschool Children: The Children’s Activity and Movement in Preschool Study Motor Skills Protocol. Vol. 13, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. p. 151–65.
49.
Zetou E, Tzetzis G, Vernadakis N &Kioumourtzoglou, E. Modeling in learning two volleyball skills. Vol. 94, Perceptual and Motor Skills. p. 1131–42.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
