STRESS COPING RELATIVE TO COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF HANDBALL PLAYERS

Goran Žakula ,
Goran Žakula

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia

Tatjana Tubić
Tatjana Tubić

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia

Published: 02.12.2015.

Vol 7, No 2 (2015), 2015, 7 (2);

pp. 41-46;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL201502020Z

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine differences in stress coping between handball players of
different competitive experience. The sample consists of 127 handball players from 10 clubs
in Serbia, 83 of whom are males and 44 are females. All participants are divided in three
groups, which are formed according to their competitive experience: up to 5 years (n = 42),
up to 10 years (n = 58), over 10 years (n = 26), with an assumption that there are no
significant differences between male and female handball players (p = .909). General SelfEfficacy Scale (SGSE; Schwarzer, & Jerusalem, 1981) is applied. The findings indicate that
there are significant differences in stress coping between handball players with different
levels of competitive experience (p = .021); the longer the competitive experience, the more
efficient stress coping is. As regards the findings of previous studies and the specificity of
handball, this paper provides possible explanation of obtained results and their
implementation in everyday activities of athletes and coaches.

Keywords

References

1.
Chen G, Guly S, Eden D. Validation of New General Self – Efficacy Scale. Vol. 4, Organizational Research Methods. p. 62.
2.
Feltz DL. Efficacy belief in sport: research on athletes, teams, and coaches. Vol. 78, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. p. 2–3.
3.
Fernandes MG, Nunes NAS, Vasconcelos-Raposo J, Fernandes MH. Factors influencing competitive anxiety in Brazilian athletes. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria Desmpenho Humano. p. 1,706-714.
4.
Fitzsimmons PA, Landers MD, Thomas RJ, Mars H. Does SelfEfficacy Predict Performance in Experienced Weightlifters? Vol. 62, Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport. p. 424–31.
5.
Gould D, Petlichkoff L, Weinberg R. Antecedents Of, Temporal Changes In, And Relationships Between CSAI-2 Subcomponents. Vol. 6, Journal of Sport Psychology. p. 289–304.
6.
Haney CJ, Long BC. Coping effectiveness: A path analysis of selfefficacy, control, coping, and performance in sport competitions. Vol. 25, Journal of Applied Social, Psychology. p. 1726–46.
7.
Martin JJ, Gill LD. The Relationships Among Competitive Orientation, SportConfidence, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Performance. Vol. 13, Journal of Sport & Excercise Psychology. p. 149–59.
8.
Hanton S, Neil R, Mellalieu S, Fletcher D. Competitive experience and performance status: An investigation into multidimensional anxiety and coping. Vol. 8, European Journal of Sport Science. p. 143–52.
9.
Rokka S, Mavridis E, Bebestos K, Mavridis K. Competitive State Anxiety among Junior Handball Players. Vol. 42, Scanidanivan Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport. p. 148–53.
10.
Shelangoski BL. Self-Efficacy in intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate. p. 17–42.
11.
Thomas GR. Self-Confidence and Baseball Performance: A Casual Examanation of Self-Efficacy Theory. Journal of Sport and Excerise Psychology. p. 16,381-399.
12.
Treasure DC, Monson J, Lox C. Relationship between Self-Efficacy, Wrestling performance, and Affect Prior to Competition. Journal of Human Kinetics,10,73-83.
13.
Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles