Differences in some morphological characteristics and repetitive strength in relation to age in handball players

Slavka Durlević Orcid logo ,
Slavka Durlević

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia,

Milica Mijajlović ,
Milica Mijajlović

University of Priština, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Leposavić, Serbia,

Marija Durlević
Marija Durlević

University of Priština, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Leposavić, Serbia,

Published: 01.12.2022.

Vol 15, No 2 (2023), 2023, 15 (2);

pp. 41-46;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.231205

Abstract

Many different anthropological parameters contribute to achieving top success in handball. Morphological characteristics and repetitive strength have been shown through scientific and practical work to be one of the most important indicators of success. Therefore, the aim of this research is to determine the differences in some morphological characteristics and repetitive strength in relation to the age of handball players. This research includes subjects of three age categories, handball players born in 2009, 2010, and 2011. The sample of measuring instruments consisted of three independent variables - age category of handball players, three variables for the assessment of morphological characteristics (body height, body mass, body mass index) and three variables for the assessment of repetitive strength (sit ups until failure, push-ups until failure and chin ups until failure). All statistical analyzes were implemented within the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 20). In all tests of morphological characteristics, significant differences were found (body height, body mass, body mass index) were at the level of p<0.005, while repetitive strength test differences were not found in the push-ups until failure test (p>0.005), but in the sit ups until failure and chin ups until failure tests, significance was determined (p<0.005).

References

1.
Bala G, Popmihajlov D. The morphological characteristics of top female handballers. Kinesiology. 1988. p. 93–9.
2.
Beunen G, Rogol A, Malina R. Indicators of biological maturation and secular changes in biological maturation. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 2006. p. 244–56.
3.
Bojić I, Živković M, Kocić M, Veličković M, Milenković D. Differences in explosive strength of elite female handball players during the competition season. Facta Universitatis, Series: Physical Education and Sport. 2019. p. 601–8.
4.
Bragazzi N, Rouissi M, Hermassi S, Chamari K. Resistance Training and Handball Players’ Isokinetic, Isometric and Maximal Strength, Muscle Power and Throwing Ball Velocity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2020.
5.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. p. 2663.
6.
Branković D, Martinović D, Ilić J. Relacije između opštih motoričkih sposobnosti i testa “slalom s loptom” učenika iv razreda osnovne škole. Sport Mont. 2012. p. 188–93.
7.
Buchheit M, Laursen P, Kuhnle J, Ruch D, Renaud C, Ahmaidi S. Game-based training in young elite handball players. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009. p. 251–8.
8.
Chelly M, Hermassi S, Shephard R. Relationships between power and strength of the upper and lower limb muscles and throwing velocity in male handball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010. p. 1480–7.
9.
Čavala M. Morfološke, motoričke i psiho-socijalne karakteristike mladih rukometašica različite igračke kvalitete i pozicije. Doctoral dissertation. 2012.
10.
Fernández-Romero J, Suárez H, Cancela J. Anthropometric analysis and performance characteristics to predict selection in young male and female handball players. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física. 2016. p. 283–9.
11.
Fieseler G, Hermassi S, Hoffmeyer B, Schulze S, Irlenbusch L, Bartels T, et al. Differences in anthropometric characteristics in relation to throwing velocity and competitive level in professional male team handball: a tool for talent profiling. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 2017. p. 985–92.
12.
Ghobadi H, Rajabi H, Farzad B, Bayati M, Jeffreys I. Povezanost između morfoloških dimenzija i efikasnosti u rukometu. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2013. p. 145–51.
13.
Katic R, Zagorac N, Zivicnjak M, Hraski Z. Taxonomic analysis of morphological motor characteristics in 7-year-old girls. Collegium antropologicum. 1994. p. 141–54.
14.
Kukolj M. Antropomotorika. Beograd: Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja. 2006.
15.
Kurelić N. Struktura i razvoj morfoloških i motorikih dimenzija omladine. Beograd: Fakultet za fizičku kulturu. 1975.
16.
Lubans D, Morgan P, Cliff D, Barnett L, Okely A. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: Review of associated health benefits. Sports Medicine. 2010. p. 1019–35.
17.
Massuça L, Fragoso I. Study of Portuguese handball players of different playing status. A morphological and biosocial perspective. Biology of Sport. 2011. p. 37–44.
18.
Massuça L, Fragoso I. Morphological characteristics of adult male handball players considering five levels of performance and playing position. Collegium antropologicum. 2015. p. 109–18.
19.
Matthys S, Vaeyens R, Vandendriessche J, Vandorpe B, Pion J, Coutts A, et al. A multidisciplinary identification model for youth handball. European Journal of Sport Science. 2011. p. 355–63.
20.
Milanese C, Piscitelli F, Lampis C, Zancanaro C. Anthropometry and body composition of female handball players according to competitive level or the playing position. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2011. p. 1301–9.
21.
Milanović D. Kanonička povezanost morfoloških i motoričkih karakteristika i rezultata u nekimatletskim disciplinama. Kinesiology. 1980. p. 25–33.
22.
Oxyzoglou N, Ore G, Rizos S. II International Conference, Univerzitet "Braća Karić "Fakultet Za Menadžment u Sportu. 2006. p. 400–14.
23.
Póvoas S, Ascensão A, Magalhães J, Seabra A, Krustrup P, Soares J, et al. Physiological demands of elite team handball with special reference to playing position. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014. p. 430–42.
24.
Rogulj N. Učinkovitost taktiĉkih modela u rukometu. Doctoral dissertation. Kineziološki fakultet; 2003.
25.
Rogulj N, Foretić N, Srhoj V, Čavala M, Papić V. Utjecaj nekih motoričkih sposobnosti na brzinu lopte kod udarca u rukometu. Acta Kinesiologica. 2007. p. 71–5.
26.
Simić M, Ilić I, Durlević S, Zadražnik M, Popović-Ilić T, Stankovic V, et al. Međunarodna naučna konferencija "Antropološki i teoantropološki pogled na fizičke aktivnosti. Zbornik radova. Urednici; 2022. p. 223–30.
27.
Srhoj V, Marinović M, Rogulj N. Position specific morphological characteristics of top-level male handball players. Collegium antropologicum. 2002. p. 219–27.
28.
Šeparović V, Užičanin E, Sršen I. Razlike u motoričkim sposobnostima rukometaša različitog ranga natjecanja. Sportski Logos. 2015. p. 13.
29.
Šibila M, Pori P. Morphological characteristics of handball players. Collegium Antropologicum. 2009. p. 1079–86.
30.
Vuleta D, Milanović D. Rukomet znanstvena istraživanja. Kineziološki fakultet; 2004.
31.
Vuleta D, Milanović D, Nikolić A. Razlike između rukometaša kadeta i mlađih kadeta u pokazateljima specifičnih motoričkih sposobnosti. Sport Mont. 2012. p. 34–7.
32.
Vuleta D, Prelčec D, Gruić I. Usporedba dvije skupine rukometaša različite kvalitete u pokazateljima kondicijske pripremljenosti. U: Zbornik radova. 2004. p. 206–11.
33.
Zapartidis I, Kororos P, Christodoulidis T, Skoufas D, Bayios I, Zatsiorsky V, et al. Nauka i praksa u treningu snage. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2011. p. 17–30.
34.
Željaskov C. Sportska akademija. 2004.
35.
Živković M, Goranović S, Marković S, Branković N. Relacije morfoloških karakteristika i testova za procenu eksplozivne snage kod mladih rukometaša. Sportlogia. 2010. p. 36–40.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles