The purpose of this study was to determine the level of motor abilities development in blind students and students without visual impairments, as well as to examine whether there are differences in motor abilities development between these two groups of participants. The research included 22 blind student (11 girls and 11 boys) and 22 students without visual impairments, aged 11-17 years. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2) was used to assess motor abilities. The analysis of the results revealed that the motor abilities development of blind students was significantly below average, while students without visual impairments showed an average level of motor abilities development. When comparing the achievements of blind students and students without visual impairments, it was observed that blind students had poorer performance on both the overall motor test and the subtests of bilateral coordination, upper limb coordination, and balance. On the other hand, students without visual impairments achieved good results on all tested subtests.
References
1.
Alibegović D, Jablan B. Motoričke sposobnosti djece oštećenog vida. Defektologija. 2009. p. 172–6.
2.
Uysal A, Duger S, T. A comparison of motor skills in Turkish children with different visual acuity. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2011. p. 23–9.
3.
Bakke H, Cavalcante W, Oliveira I, Sarinho S, Cattuzzo M. Assessment of motor skills in children with visual impairment: A systematic and integrative review. Clinical Medicine Insights: Pediatrics. 2019. p. 1–10.
4.
Bouchard D, Tetreault S. The motor development of sighted children and children with moderate low vision aged 8-13. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. 2000. p. 564–73.
5.
Bruininks R, Bruininks B. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Pearson Assessment; 2005.
6.
Calık B, Aslan U, Aslan S, Kabul E. The effect of static and dynamic balance training on balance in children with congenital blindness. Cagdas Tıp Dergisi. 2019. p. 89–94.
7.
Christodoulou P. Motor development and adaptive behavior in children and adolescents with visual impairment. Doctoral dissertation. 2016.
8.
Christodoulou M, Mousouli М, Spyridon-Georgios S, Christopoulou F, Christopoulos К. Effects of an exercise program on children and adolescents with visual impairment. Open Sci J Education. 2017. p. 32–9.
9.
Christodoulou P, Fotiadou E, Soulis S, Christopoulos K, Christopoulou F, &christopoulou E. Relationship of motor development to adaptive behavior of children and adolescents with visual impairment. European Journal of Special Education Research. 2019. p. 115–31.
10.
Ćosić M, Kasum G, Radovanović S, Koprivica V. Godišnjak Fakulteta sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja. 2014. p. 81–101.
11.
Grbovic A, Jorgic B. Motor abilities of children with different levels of visual acuity. 2017.
12.
Factauniversitatis. Series: Physical Education and Sport. p. 175–84.
13.
Haegele J, Brian A, Goodway J. Fundamental motor skills and school-aged individuals with visual impairments: A review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2015. p. 320–7.
14.
Haibach P, Wagner M, Lieberman L. Determinants of gross motor skill performance in children with visual impairments. Research in developmental disabilities. 2014. p. 2577–84.
15.
Hadzimehmedovic D, Memisevic H. The effects of four-month exercise program in improving the gross motor skills of students with visual impairment. Homo Sporticus. 2018. p. 36–40.
16.
Houwen S, Visscher C, Lemmink K, Hartman E. Motor skill performance of school age children with visual impairments. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2008. p. 139–45.
17.
Houwen S, Visscher C, Lemmink K, Hartman E. Motor skill performance of children and adolescents with visual impairments: A review. Exceptional Children. 2009. p. 464–92.
18.
Houwen S, Hartman E, Visscher C. The relationship among motor proficiency, physical fitness, and body composition in children with and without visual impairments. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2010. p. 290–9.
19.
Houwen S, Hartman E, Jonker L, Visscher C. Reliability and validity of the TGMD-2 in primary schoolaged children with visual impairments. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 2010. p. 149–59.
20.
Ilić-Stošović D, Nikolić S. Learning Disabilities. 2012. p. 217–41.
21.
Levtzion-Korach O, Tennenbaum A, Schnitzer R, Ornoy A, Nakata H, Yabe K. Automatic postural response systems in individuals with congenital total blindness. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2000. p. 36–43.
22.
Romanov R, Koretić M, Garunović B. Neki pokazatelji morfološkog i motoričkog prostora slepih i slabovidih učenika. SPORT-Nauka i Praksa. 2017. p. 15–26.
23.
Rutkowska I, Bednarczuk G, Molik B, Morgulec-Adamowicz N, Marszałek J, Kaźmierska-Kowalewska K, et al. Balance functional assessment in people with visual impairment. Journal of human kinetics. 2015. p. 99–109.
24.
Rutkowska I, Lieberman L, Bednarczuk G, Molik B, Kazimierska-Kowalewska K, Marszałek J, et al. Bilateral coordination of children who are blind. Perceptual and motor skills. 2016. p. 595–609.
25.
Schmid M, Nardone A, De Nunzio A, Schmid M, Schieppati M. Equilibrium during static and dynamic tasks in blind subjects: no evidence of cross-modal plasticity. Brain. 2007. p. 2097–107.
26.
Sretenović I, Nedović G. Motor development of children with visual impairment. Human Research in Rehabilitation the International Journal for interdisciplinary studies. 2019. p. 36–41.
27.
Uzunović S, Zdravković G, Kostić R, Pantelić S, Milanović Z, Jorgić B, et al. Comparison of the static balance of children with and without visual impairment. Research in Physical Education, Sport & Health. 2015. p. 95–9.
28.
Vučinić V, Anđelković M. Rana intervencija za desu sa oštećenjem vida. 2021.
29.
Wagner M, Haibach P, Lieberman L. Gross motor skill performance in children with and without visual Impairments-research to practice. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2013. p. 3246–52.
30.
Wiszomirska I, Kaczmarczyk K, Blazkiewicz M, Wit A. The Impact of a vestibular stimulating exercise regime on postural stability in people with visual impairment. BioMed Research International. 2015. p. 1–9.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
