SPRINTING SPEED OF PREPUBERTAL GIRLS AND BOYS

Vladimir Jakovljević ,
Vladimir Jakovljević

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adriana Ljubojević ,
Adriana Ljubojević

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Tamara Karlić ,
Tamara Karlić

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Nikolina Gerdijan ,
Nikolina Gerdijan

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Željko Vukić ,
Željko Vukić

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Goran Pašić
Goran Pašić

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Published: 02.12.2013.

Vol 5, No 2 (2013), 2013, 5 (2);

pp. 20-27;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL201302039J

Abstract

The research problem was to analyze manifestation of sprinting speed and to compare the results
obtained in prepubertal children in relation to gender. The aim of this study was to analyze the
basic motor ability related to velocity in children before puberty. The study was conducted on the
sample of 71 subjects who were divided into two subgroups: 37 boys and 34 girls, aged 9 years
+/- 6 months. Three tests were applied for measurement of sprinting speed: time running 10
meters, high start time running 20 meters, high and start time running 20 meters flying start. The
results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between subjects with respect
to gender, in all three tests applied to estimate sprint speed at the level of p <0.05. On this basis, it
was concluded that prepubertal period of half of the respondents in the prepubertal period, as a
criterion, does not constitute a basis for a statistically significant difference in the exercise of
sprint speed.

Keywords

References

1.
Babić V, Blažević I i V, J. Karakteristike sprinterskog trčanja djece predškolske i mlađe školske dobi. Vol. 25, Hrvatski sportskomedicinski vijesnik, godište. p. 3–8.
2.
Bala G, Stojanović M i S, M. Mjerenje i definisanje motoričkih sposobnosti dece, Novi Sad: Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja.
3.
Bijelić S i S, S. Trenažna tehnologija u radu sa mladim sportistima, Banja Luka: Sekretarijat za sport i omladinu u Vladi Republike Srpske.
4.
Blažević I, Babić V i A, Lj. Sprintersko trčanje djece mlađe školske dobi. 6-ti Kongres FIEP-a Europe „TJELESNA I ZDRAVSTVENA KULTURA U 21. In: STOLJEĆUKOMPETENCIJE UČENIKA“ Zbornik radova. p. 74–81.
5.
Caput-Jogunica R. Kineziologija-priručnik za studente Učiteljskog fakulteta-dislocirani studij u Slavonskom Brodu.
6.
Čoh M i Ž, M. Biomehaničke karakteristike razvoja maksimalne brzine. In: 2th International Scientific Conference “‘ANTROPOLOGICAL ASPECT OF SPORTS, PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND RECREATION’” Proceedings Book. p. 7–15.
7.
Guzalovsky AA. Physical education of schoolchildren in critical periods of development. Vol. 7, Teoria i praktika fizicheskoi kulturõ. p. 37–9.
8.
Janković M. Meta analiza kvantitativnih razlika antropometrijskih karakteristika i motoričkih sposobnosti dece uzrasta 6 i 7 godina. Fizička kultura. Vol. 1. Vol. 68, Broj. p. 5–12.
9.
Kurelić N, Momirović K, Stojanović Đ, Radojević N i VŠ, N. Struktura i razvoj morfoloških i motoričkih dimenzija omladine.
10.
Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity.
11.
Mikić B, Biberović A i M, S. Univerzalna škola sporta.
12.
Nićin Đ. Antropomotorika.
13.
Petrović B i K, A. Uticaj izabranog trenažnog modela na poboljšanje maksimalne brzine trčanja. In: Glasnik Br 277-82 Banja Luka: Fakultet fizičkog vaspitanja i sporta.
14.
Petrović B, Kukrić A i G, B. Efekti sprinterskog modela treninga usmjerenog na poboljšanje kinematičkih parametara maksimalne brzine trčanja. Vol. 3, Glasnik. Br. p. 39–44.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles