The aim of this study was to compare the somatotype of youth Croatian female volleyball players (mean age 14.05 years) in terms of playing performance. All players evaluated were classified into a less successful group (N=53) and a group of more successful players (N=61). The somatotype means of the whole sample were 4.41 ñ 2.79 ñ 3.68±1.02 ñ 1.04 ñ 1.29, of less successful players 4.69 ñ 2.94 ñ 3.40 ± 0.95 ñ 0.96 ñ 1.21, and of more successful players 4.17 ñ 2.69 ñ 3.87 ± 1.03 ñ 1.07 ñ 1.30. Based on a Category Chart, 7 somatotype categories were obtained. A significantly higher proportion of balanced ectomorph somatotype category was established in more successful players, and a significantly higher proportion of ectomorphic- endomorph somatotype category was found in less successful players.
Ayan V, Bektas Y, E AE. Anthropometric and performance characteristics of Turkey National U-14 volleyball players. Vol. 18, African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance. p. 395–403.
2.
Bayios IA, Bergeles NK, Apostolidis NG, Noutsos KS, B KM. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players. Vol. 46, Jurnal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. p. 271–80.
3.
Cabral BG, Cabral SA, Batista GR, Fernandes Filho J, Knackfuss MI. Somatotype and anthropometry in brazilian national volleyball teams. Vol. 4, Motricidade. p. 67–73.
4.
Carter JEL, Ackland TR, Kerr DA, Stapff AB. Somatotype and size of elite female basketball players. Vol. 23, Journal of Sports Sciences. p. 1057–63.
5.
Carter JEL, Heath BH. Somatotyping: Development and Applications.
6.
Carvajal W, Betancourt H, León S, Deturnel Y, Martínez M, Echevarría I, et al. Kinanthropometric profile of Cuban women Olympic volleyball champions. Vol. 14, MEDICC Revision. p. 16–22.
7.
Hoyo M, Corrales BS, Paez BS. Determinación del somatotipo En jugadores infantiles de voleibol: validez como criterio de selección de jóvenes talentos. Vol. 10, Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano. p. 255–60.
8.
I. D, Riegerová J, Pøidalová M. Body composition of young volleyball players. In: 5th International Conference Movement and Health 2007.
9.
Duncan MJ, Woodfield L, Al-Nakeeb Y. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior elite volleyball players. Vol. 40, British Journal of Sports Medicine. p. 649–51.
10.
Esper A. Mediciones antropométricas en jugadoras argentinas de voleibol de primera división. Vol. 10, Revista digital de Educación Física y Deportes.
11.
Grgantov Z, Katiã R, Jankoviã V. Morphological characteristics, technical and situation efficacy of young female volleyball players. Vol. 30, Collegium Antropologicum. p. 87–96.
12.
E. GR, Zaccagni R. Somatotype, role and performance in elite volleyball players. Vol. 41, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. p. 256–62.
13.
R. K, Jukiã J, Miliã M. Biomotor status and kinesiological education of students aged 13 to 15 years – example: karate. Vol. 36, Collegium Antropologicum. p. 555–62.
14.
Malousaris GG, Bergeles KBNK, Barzouka KG, Bayios IA, Nassis GP, Koskolou MD. Somatotype, size and body composition of competitive female volleyball players. Vol. 11, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. p. 337–44.
15.
Riegerová J, Ryavý J. Somatodiagnostics of female, secondary school age volleyball players. Vol. 31, Gymnica. p. 37–42.
16.
Miliã M, Grgantov Z, Soares RK, A. C, Paula AH. Análise do perfil cineantropométrico de jovens praticantes de voleibol na faixa etária de 12 a 15 anos. Vol. 1, Movimentum-Revista Digital de Educação Física. p. 1–15.
17.
Zapartidis I, Vareltzis I, Gouvali M, Kororos P. Profile of young handball players by playing position and determinants of ball throwing velocity. Vol. 2, Open Sports Sciences Journal. p. 22–8.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.