PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING AND GENERAL HEALTH OF WOMEN FROM URBAN AND RURAL AREAS

Sara Szakal
Sara Szakal

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Published: 02.12.2011.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2011)

pp. 31-42;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL201102064S

Abstract

Women generally live longer than men because of both biological and behavioural advantages; still womenís longer lives are not necessarily healthy lives. Considering that women from rural areas are often recognized as particularly vulnerable social groups concerning quality of life and physical activity, the study was conducted aiming to determine physical functioning and general health of women from urban and rural areas, as well as to examine differences between them in these health domains. Sample comprises of females aged 30 to 60 yrs, totally 146 participants (73 from urban areas, 73 from rural areas). For the purposes of this study two scales, Physical functioning and General health perceptions, from the SF-36 Health Survey. The results obtained show that significant differences between two groups of participant exist in both domains, with more positive self-perceptions of physical functioning in urban females and more positive global health perceptions in rural females. These results confirm that personal satisfaction and perception of oneís global health are affected not merely by the physical functioning, but by other health components as well.

Keywords

References

1.
Blagojevic M. Seoske Zenske organizacije u Vojvodini.
2.
Byles J, Mishra G, Brookes J. Landscapes of healthy ageing. Vol. 12, National Rural Health Conference. p. 101–18.
3.
Cleary KK, Howell MD. Using the SF-36 to Determine Perceived Health-Related Quality of Life in Rural Idaho Seniors. Vol. 35, Journal of Allied Health. p. 156–61.
4.
Cvejic S, Babovic M, Petrovié M, Bogdanov N i V, O. Socijalna iskljucenost u ruralnim oblastima Srbije.
5.
Đordic V. Rezultati istrazivanja o finansiranju Zenskog sporta u opstinama Vojvodine. U Polozaj Zena u sportu u Vojvodini (29-38.
6.
Stewart AL, Ware JE. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach.
7.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SK. SF-36® Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual.
8.
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36® Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide.
9.
Ware JB, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHomey CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF 36 Health Profile and Summary Measures: Summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Vol. 33, Medical Care. p. 264–79.
10.
W.H.O.Q.O.L. Measuring quality of life.
11.
Organization WH. Executive Summary: Women and Health: Today’s Evidence, Tomorrow’s Agenda.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by