The article intends to show the impact of a pedagogical proposal in Physical Education (PE). The proposal was focussed on autonomy, personal and social responsibility, and decision-making in order to prepare the individual to be able to keep an active lifestyle, in terms of exercising, after finishing compulsory education. This proposal could be considered as an interactive teaching model (Blanchard, 2009) in which the students play an active and reflexive role in all the decisions taken during the teaching-learning process. Also, it shares aspects with the Sport Education model by Daryl Siedentop and the Social and Personal Responsibility model by Don Hellison. The research is a longitudinal study that used an ethnographic methodology to study the teaching-learning process of a mixed group of 25 students led by a PE teacher at a school in CataluÒa, Spain. The aim was to learn about studentsí opinion on their learning in PE lessons, their current exercise habits and their own autonomy and initiative to keep on exercising. The results show that the specific learning environment, the personality of the teacher, the teacher- student relationship, the strategies and the contents had had a significant impact on students. This impact exceeded any expectations related to concepts of physically active lifestyles and it included aspects of social awareness, responsibility, respect, empathy and recognition of the importance of PE in their lives.
Aebli H. Factores de la enseñanza que favorecen el aprendizaje autónomo.
2.
Ayuste A, Flecha R, López F, Lleras J. Planteamientos de la pedagogia critica. Comunicar y transformar.
3.
Bain L. The hidden curriculum re-examined. Vol. 37, Quest. p. 145–53.
4.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercici of control.
5.
Blanchard J. Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
6.
Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method.
7.
Bodgan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative Research for education: an introduction to theory and methods.
8.
Cardon GM, Haerens LL, Verstrate S, Bourdeaudhuij I de. Perceptions of a school-based self management program promoting an active lifestyle among elementary schoolchildren, teachers and parents. Vol. 28, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. p. 141–54.
9.
Carr M. Assessment in Early Childhood Settings: Learning Stories.
10.
Ceccini JA, Montero J, Peña JV. Repercusiones del Programa de Intervención para Desarrollar la Responsabilidad Personal y Social de Hellison sobre los comportamientos de fair-play y el auto-control. Vol. 15, Psicotema. p. 631–7.
11.
Crum BJ. A Critical Review of Competing Physical Education Concepts. In: Sport Sciences in Europe 1993 - Current and Future Perspectives. p. 516–33.
12.
Busk M, Hellison D. Implementing a PE self-responsibility model for deliquency-prone youth. Vol. 8, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. p. 104–12.
13.
Dowda MC, Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Rosengard PR, Kohl HW. Evaluating the sustainability of SPARK physical education: A case study of translating research into practice. Vol. 76, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. p. 11–9.
14.
Engström LM. Who is physically active? Cultural capital and sports participation from adolescence to middle age: A 38-year follow-up study. Vol. 13, Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy. p. 319–43.
15.
Escarti A, Gutiérrez M, Pascual C, Marin D, Martinez C, Chacón Y. Enseñando responsabilidad personal y social a un grupo de adolescentes de riesgo:un estudio observacional. Vol. 341, Revista de Educación. p. 373-396.
16.
Fernández-Balboa JM. Sociocultural characteristics of the hidden curriculum in Physical Education. Vol. 45, Quest. p. 230–54.
17.
Fernández-Balboa JM. Pedagogía crítica y educación física en la escuela secundaria.
Freire P. Pedagogia de la autonomía: saberes necesarios para la práctica educativa.
20.
Goetz JP, Lecompte MD. Etnografía y diseño cualitativo en investigación educativa.
21.
Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in Qualitative Research.
22.
In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. p. 105–17.
23.
Hargreaves A. Rethinking Educational Change with Heart and Mind.
24.
Hastie P. Putting pedagogy back into sport pedagogy research: A case for more applied research in physical education. In: Paper presented in the SIG BERA.
25.
Hastie Uw, P. M de O, D. LC, A. A review of research on Sport Education: 2004 to the present. Vol. 16, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. p. 103–32.
26.
Hellison DR. Goals and Strategies for Teaching Physical Education.
27.
Hellison D, Walsh D. Responsibility-based Youth Programs evaluation: investigating the investigations. Vol. 54, Quest. p. 292–307.
28.
Kesten C. Independent learning: a common essential learning : a study completed for the Saskatchewan Department of Education, Core Curriculum Investigation Project.
29.
Kirk D. Educación Física y curriculum.
30.
Kirk D, MacPhail A. Teaching Games for Understanding and Situated Learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model. Vol. 21, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. p. 177–92.
31.
Kirk D. Physical Education Futures.
32.
Kirk D. Physical Education for the 21st Century (to be published in S.Capel and M. In: Debates in Physical Education.
33.
Lapassade G. Autogestión pedagógica: un sistema en el cual los educandos deciden en que consiste su formación y la dirigen.
34.
Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry.
35.
Lobrot M. Pedagogia Institucional. La escuela hacia la autogestión.
36.
Lorente E. Autogestión en Educación Física. Un estudio de caso en Secundaria.
37.
Universidad de Barcelona Tesis Doctoral. Publicación digital.
38.
Lorente E. Estimular la responsabilidad y la iniciativa: autogestión en Educación Física.
39.
Apunts Educació fisica i esport, 92, 2nd trimestre. p. 26–34.
40.
Lorente E, Joven A. Autogestión: Una investigación etnográfica. Vol. 21, Cultura & Educación. p. 67–9.
41.
Manifiesto del Parlamento Europeo en defensa de la Educación Física y el Deporte.
42.
Marcoux M, Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Marshall S, Armstrong CA, Goggin KJ. Process evaluation of a physical activity self-management program for children: SPARK. Vol. 14, Psychology & Health. p. 659–77.
43.
Martinek T, Schilling T, Johnson D. Transferring personal and social responsibility of underserved youth to the classroom. Vol. 33, The Urban Review. p. 29–45.
44.
Martínez-Martin M y B, C. F, M., Prats E. Un lugar llamado escuela. En la sociedad de la información y de la diversidad. Vol. 16, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. p. 265–78.
45.
Meirieu P. Frankenstein Educador.
46.
Orientacions per al desplegament curricular d’Educació Física.
47.
Puig JM, Martínez M. Educación moral y democracia.
48.
Reboul O. ¿Transformar la sociedad? ¿Transformar la educación?
49.
Reboul O. La philosophie de l’éducation.
50.
Reboul O. Los valores de la educación.
51.
Rodriguez G, Gil J, García E. Metodologia de la investigación cualitativa.
52.
Rodriguez Moreno ML. Como orientar hacia la construcción del proyecto profesional. Autonomia individual, sistema de valores e identidad laboral de los jóvenes.
53.
Rogers C. Libertad y creatividad en educación en la década de los ochenta.
54.
Santos Guerra MA. La evaluación: un proceso de diálogo, comprensión y mejora.
55.
Savater F. El valor de educar.
56.
Spindler G. Doing the Ethnography of Schooling: Educational Anthropology in Action.
57.
Spindler G, Spindler L. Cultural process and ethnography: an anthropological perspective. In: The handbook of qualitative research in education. p. 53–92.
58.
Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: An Integration of self-determination and goal perspective teories in predicting leisure-time exercici intentions. Vol. 95, Journal of Educational Psichology. p. 97–110.
59.
Siedentop D. Sport Education: A Retrospective. Vol. 21, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. p. 409–18.
60.
Silverman S, Ennis C. Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction.
61.
Sparkes AC. Perspectivas del curriculum de Educación Física: una exploración del poder, del control y de la ubicación del problema. In: Comunicación presentada en el VIII Congreso Nacional de Educación Física de EU de Formación del Profesorado de EGB.
62.
Stake RE. Investigación con estudio de casos.
63.
Stenhouse L. Investigación y desarrollo del curriculum.
64.
J. TS, Bodgan R. Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados.
65.
Tinning R. Educación fisica: la escuela y sus profesores.
66.
Manen M. El tacto en la enseñanza. El significado de la sensibilidad pedagógica.
67.
Whitehead NJ, Hendry LB. Teaching Physical Education in England: Description and Analysis.
68.
Bicg93 W. Inverigar el are de la enseianea Eluse de la tegefa en la educctor.
69.
Yli-Piipari S, Watt A, Jaakkola T, Liukkonen J, Nurmi J. Relationships between physical education students’ motivational profil-les, enjoyment, state anxiety, and self-reported physical activity. Vol. 8, Journal of Sport Science and Medicine. p. 327–36.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
