Supracondylar fractures of humerus are the most frequent arm fractures in childhood. Complications of these fractures most often take the form of elbow contractures. The aim of this paper was to determine effects of rehabilitation treatment and characteristics of elbow contractures. During five-year period (2005-2010), 61 patients with posttraumatic elbow contracture were treated at the Institute for Children and Youth Health Care of Vojvodina. Flynnís three-grade scale was applied to determine the elbow mobility level, prior to treatment and at its end. After the completed physical treatment, there is a highly statistically significant difference in terms of increased flexion and extension of elbow (p0.0001). In 90.16% children, the result was satisfactory upon completed physical treatment. By means of combined application of different forms of physical therapy, treatment results of elbow contractures after supracondylar fractures have significantly improved.
Ayadi K, Trigui M, Tounsi N, Ellouze Z. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Vol. 92, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Réparatrice de l’Appareil Moteur. p. 651–6.
2.
Arena S, Vermiglio G, Terranova A, Vermiglio M, Arena P. Trattamento ortopedico e riabilitativo nelle fratture sovracondiloidee di omero in età evolutiva. Vol. 22, Acta Chirurgica Mediterranea. p. 169–73.
3.
Banovic MD. Traumatologija kostano-zglobnog sistema. Gornji Milanovac: Decije novine.
4.
Bombaci H, Gereli A, Kucukyazici O, Gorgec M. A new technique of crossed pins in supracondylar elbow fractures in children. Vol. 28, Orthopedics. p. 1406–9.
5.
Carmichael KD, Joyner K. Quality of reduction versus timing of surgical intervention for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Vol. 29, Orthopedics. p. 628–32.
6.
Cekanauskas E, Degliute R, Kalesinkas RJ. Treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children, according to Gartland classification. Vol. 39, Medicina. p. 379–83.
7.
Coulon G, D. C, Rosa V, M. PJ, Kaelin A. Nonoperative treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures in children: Rigault type 2 fractures. Vol. 76, Acta Orthopaedica. p. 858–61.
8.
Pellegrin M, Brivio A, Pescatori E, Tessari L. Frattura sovracondiloidea di omero in età infantile. Osteosintesi percutanea in posizione prona. Vol. 34, G.I.O.T. p. 199–204.
9.
Divjakovic M, Mikov A, Gajdobranski Đ. Effect of physical therapy on treatment of contractures of elbow after supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Vol. 9, Medicina danas. p. 90–7.
10.
Foead A, Penafort R, Saw A, Sengupta S. Comparsion of two methods of percutaneous pin fixation in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Vol. 12, Journal of Orthopedic Surgery. p. 76–82.
11.
Gadgil A, Hayhurst C, Maffulli N, Dwyer JSM. Elevated, straight-arm traction for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Vol. 87, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. p. 82–7.
12.
Gajdobranski Đ, Marié D, Tatié M, Duric-Nosek D i MA. Osteosinteza Kirinerovim iglama u lecenju dislociranih suprakondilarnih preloma humerusa kod dece. Vol. 56, Medicinski pregled. p. 355–61.
13.
Griffin KJ, Walsh SR, Markar S, Tang TY, Boyle JR, Hayes PD. The pink pulsless hand: a review of the literature regarding management of vascular complications of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Vol. 36, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. p. 697–702.
14.
Gris M, Nieuwenhove O, Gehanne C, Quintin J, Burny F. Treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children using external fixation. Vol. 27, Orthopedics. p. 1146–50.
15.
He BX, Zhang B, Tan YJ. Comparsion of clinical effects of various external fixation for the treatment of humeral supracondylar fracture. Vol. 22, Zhongguo Gu Shang. p. 190–2.
16.
Jandrió SĐ. Terapijski efekat fizikalnih procedura na kontrakture lakta kod djece sa suprakondilarom frakturom humerusa. Vol. 54, Acta Chirurgica iugoslavica. p. 39–43.
17.
Kaiser MM, Kamphaus A, Massalme E, Wessel LM. Percutaneous closed pin fixation of supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus in children. Vol. 20, Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie. p. 297–309.
18.
Karapinar L, Ozturk H, Altay T, Kose B. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with three Kirschner wires in children with type III displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Vol. 39, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. p. 23–9.
19.
Keppler P, Salem K, Schwarting B, Kinzl L. The effectiveness of physiotherapy after operative treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Vol. 25, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics. p. 314–6.
20.
Patrice Eiff M, Hatch RL.
21.
Platt B. Supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Vol. 12, Emergency Nurse. p. 22–30.
22.
Sibinski M, Sharma H, Bennet GC. Early versus delayed treatment of extension type-3 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Vol. 88, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. p. 380–1.
23.
Slongo T, Schmid T, Wilkins, K. J, A. Lateral external fixation: A new surgical technique for displaced unreducible supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Vol. 90, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. p. 1690–7.
24.
Solazzo V, Bertolani G, Traina F. Le complicanze vasculo-nervose nelle fratture sovracondiloidee di omero nel bambino: nostra esperienza. Vol. 26, G.I.O.T. p. 196–200.
25.
Tanno M, Tanaka H, Mukai E, Hayashi Y, Takenouchi K. Supracondylar and condylar fracture of the humerus. Vol. 18, Clinical Calcium. p. 1332–8.
26.
Temple A, Bache CE, Gibbsons PJ. Fractures of the elbow : supracondylar fractures. Vol. 8, Trauma. p. 123–30.
27.
Tiwari A, Kanojia RK, Kapoor SK. Surgical management for late presentation of supracondylar humeral fracture in children. Vol. 15, Journal of Orthopedic Surgery. p. 177–82.
28.
Čolović H, Stanković I, Dimitrijević L, Živković V, Nikolić D. Značaj modifikovanog DASH upitnika u proceni funkcijskog stanja lakta nakon suprakondilarnih fraktura humerusa kod dece. Vol. 65, Vojnosanitetski pregled. p. 27–32.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
