ATTITUDE OF FOOTBALL PLAYERS OF DIFFERENT SPORTING EXPERIENCE TOWARDS UNALLOWED STIMULATIVE RECOVERY DRUGS

Miroslav Smajić ,
Miroslav Smajić

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia

Dragoljub Bekvalac ,
Dragoljub Bekvalac

Football Club "Hajduk", Kula, Kula, Serbia

Dragoljub Bekvalac ,
Dragoljub Bekvalac

Football Club "Hajduk", Kula, Kula, Serbia

Alen Kapidžić ,
Alen Kapidžić

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Alen Kapidžić
Alen Kapidžić

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Published: 02.12.2010.

Volume 2, Issue 2 (2010)

pp. 75-84;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL201002084S

Abstract

Usage of unallowed stimulative drugs for recovery implies consuming or giving to others substances which artificially improve physical and psychical condition of an athlete and thus improve his/her success in sport. The goal of the study is to examine attitudes of football players of various length of sports experience, towards unallowed stimulative substances for recovery. The sample of examinees consists of 120 football players divided into two groups, on basis of the sports experience length (first group: 4-8 years of sport experience, second group: 9-14 years). The sample of variables consists of a system of 10 items (claims) assessed on a 5-grade scale. The importance of the differences between the groups was determined by a multivariate and univariate analysis of variance, discriminative analysis, Royís test, Pearson's coefficient of contingency and the coefficient of multiple correlation. It is evident that football players of different length of sport experience differ among themselves in their attitudes towards unallowed drugs for recovery, however, those differences are not big.

Keywords

References

1.
Backhouse S, McKenna J, Robinson S, Atkin A. International literature review: Attitudes, behaviours, knowledge and education – drugs in sport: Past, present and future.
2.
Bishop PA, Jones E, Woods AK. Recovery from training: A brief review. Vol. 22, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. p. 1015–24.
3.
Franques P, Auriacombe M, Tignol J. Sports, use of performance enhancing drugs and addiction. Vol. 152, Annals of Internal Medicine. p. 37–49.
4.
Havelka N, Lazarević L. Sport i ličnost.
5.
Llorens N. Young people’s attitudes towards doping in sport.
6.
Malacko J, Rađo I. Tehnologija sporta i sportskog treninga. Sarajevo: Fakultet sporta i tjelesnog odgoja.
7.
Naglić V, Milošević R. Doping.
8.
Pipe A, Ayotte C. Nutritional supplements and doping. Vol. 12, Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine. p. 245–9.
9.
Sas-Nowosielski K, Świątkowska L. The knowledge of the world anti-doping code among Polish athletes and their attitudes toward doping and anti-doping policy. Vol. 8, Human Movement. p. 57–64.
10.
Sekulić D, Kostić R, Miletić Ž. Substance use in dance sport. Vol. 23, Medical Problems of Performing Artists. p. 66–70.
11.
Smajić M, Mihajlović I, Bekvalac D. Attitudes of footballers of different sports experience to training means of recovery. Vol. 4, Acta Kinesiologica. p. 98–101.
12.
Smajić M, Molnar S, Popović S. Stavovi fudbalera različitog ranga takmičenja o trenažnim sredstvima oporavka. Vols. 18–20, Sportmont. p. 149–52.
13.
Smajić M, Molnar S, Popović S, Tomić B. Stavovi fudbalera različitog ranga takmičenja o nedozvoljenim stimulativnim sredstvima oporavka. U Zbornik radova 2. Međunarodnog simpozijuma „Sport i zdravlje. p. 18–21.
14.
Smajić M, Tomić B, Kapidžić A, Joksimović A. The attitudes of footballers belonging to different ranks of competition towards allowed stimulation recovery medicines. Vol. 6, Sport Scientific and Practical Aspects. p. 13–6.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by