A comparison of heart rates between simulated and real altitude

Stojan Burnik ,
Stojan Burnik

Faculty of Sport, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Blaž Jereb
Blaž Jereb

Faculty of Sport, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Published: 01.06.2009.

Volume 1, Issue 1 (2009)

pp. 42-48;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL200901092B

Abstract

The aim of the presents study is to make a comparison between heart rates measured at real altitude and at the simulated altitude (in hypoxic chamber), before and after the process of acclimatization. Six students (two women and four men) of Faculty of sport in Ljubljana participated in the study. They undergone eighteen day long acclimatization process on 2100 - 5642 m. Heart rates were measured in rest and during the step test before and after the acclimatization, at two locations: high altitude simulation chamber in Ljubljana and real altitude in Elbrus, Kavkaz, both at 2100 m. The results showed that heart rates were not significantly different between real altitude and simulated altitude. Acclimatization process caused a decrease of heart rates in both cases. From that we can conclude that it would be possible to train in hypoxic chamber and therefore shorten the acclimatization time in real very high mountains. Heart rate could be used as an objective parameter of the quality of the acclimatization. This should be proven in the future by research on bigger sample.

Keywords

References

1.
Balado D. Exercise physiology; energy, nutrition and human performance.
2.
Boushel R, Calbet JA, Radegran G, Sondergaard H, Wagner PD, Saltin B. Parasympathetic neural activity accounts for lowering of exercise heart rate at high altitude. Vol. 104, Circulation. p. 1785 1791.
3.
Casas M, Casas H, Pages T, Rama R, Ricart A, Ventura JL, et al. Intermittent hypobaric hypoxia induces altitude acclimation and improves the lactate threshold. Vol. 71, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. p. 125–30.
4.
Debevec T, Burnik S, Jereb B. Dynamics of heart rate under step test loading as an indicator of altitude acclimatization. Vol. 13, Kinesiologia Slovenica. p. 5 13.
5.
Hackett PH, Roach RC. High-altitude illness. Vol. 345, The New England Journal of Medicine. p. 107–14.
6.
Lundby C, Hall G. Peak heart rates at extreme altitudes. Vol. 2, High Altitude Medicine & Biology. p. 41–5.
7.
Mazzeo RS, Brooks GA, Butterfield GE, Podolin DA, Wolfel EE, Reeves JT. Acclimatization to high altitude increases muscle sympathetic activity both at rest and during exercise. Vol. 269, American Journal of Physiology. p. 201 207.
8.
Pavlidis M, Stupp T, Georgalas I, Georgiadu E, Moschoh M, Thanos S. Intraocular pressure changes during high-altitude acclimatization. Vol. 244, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. p. 298–304.
9.
Richalet JP, Bittel J, Herry JP, Savourey G, Le Trong JL, Auvert JF, et al. Use of a hypobaric chamber for pre-acclimatization before climbing Mount Everest. Vol. 13, International Journal of Sports Medicine. p. 216–20.
10.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by