Exploring self-declared prohibited substance use in combat sports: The Serbian perspective

Vuk Raonić ,
Vuk Raonić

University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Ivana Milovanović ,
Ivana Milovanović

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Roberto Roklicer ,
Roberto Roklicer
Contact Roberto Roklicer

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Marko Manojlović ,
Marko Manojlović

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Tatjana Trivić ,
Tatjana Trivić

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Patrik Drid Orcid logo
Patrik Drid

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Published: 06.12.2024.

Volume 16, Issue 2 (2024)

pp. 57-72;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.241208

Abstract

The exploratory study is grounded in field research, utilizing semi-structured interviews with active, former, and recreational athletes in combat sports. The first section outlines key theoretical frameworks that address everyday life, lifestyles, and the issue of doping. The second section presents the main findings from the field research. Interviewees detailed the positive effects of doping on athletic performance while also acknowledging significant side effects, including physical and psychological consequences. Participants highlighted that the availability of information on doping has increased with the advent of the Internet and specialized retail outlets. The testimonies indicate that the culture of doping is driven not only by the pursuit of enhanced sports performance but also by aesthetic considerations and social pressures, underscoring the complexity of doping use in both professional and recreational sports. The study concludes that doping is a pervasive issue in combat sports, necessitating comprehensive social action and collaboration among policymakers, social stakeholders, and researchers across multiple disciplines, with a prominent role for physical education and sports sciences.

Keywords

References

Backhouse, S. H. (2023). A behaviorally informed approach to reducing the risk of inadvertent anti-doping rule violations from supplement use. Sports Medicine, 53(Suppl. 1), 67–84.
Baoutina, A. (2020). A brief history of the development of a gene doping test. Bioanalysis, 12(11), 723–727.
Bricknell, S. (2015). Corruption in Australian sport. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 490, 1–11.
Brkljačić, M. (2007). Etika i sport [Ethics and sport. Medicina Fluminensis, 43(3), 230–233.
Dikić, N. (2016). Doping prevention: Experience of Antidoping Agency of Serbia. Medicinski Podmladak, 67(2), 31–38.
Fair, J. D. (1993). Isometrics or steroids? Exploring new frontiers of strength in the early 1960s. Journal of Sport History, 20–30.
Fares, M. Y., Baydoun, H., Salhab, H. A., Khachfe, H. H., Fares, Y., Fares, J., & Abboud, J. A. (2021). Doping in the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC): A 4‐year epidemiological analysis. Drug Testing and Analysis, 13(4), 785–793.
Horne, J., & Manzenreiter, W. (2006). An introduction to the sociology of sports mega-events. The Sociological Review, 54(2suppl), 1–24.
Hurst, P., Ring, C., & Kavussanu, M. (2022). Moral values and moral identity moderate the indirect relationship between sport supplement use and doping use via sport supplement beliefs. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(10), 1160–1167.
Kobierecki, M. M., & Strożek, P. (2021). Sports mega-events and shaping the international image of states: How hosting the Olympic Games and FIFA World Cups affects interest in host nations. International Politics, 58(1), 49–70.
Laure, P., & Binsinger, C. (2007). Doping prevalence among preadolescent athletes: a 4-year follow-up. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(10), 660–663.
Laure, P., Binsinger, C., & Lecerf, T. (2003). General practitioners and doping in sport: attitudes and experience. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(4), 335–338.
Lentillon‐Kaestner, V., & Carstairs, C. (2010). Doping use among young elite cyclists: a qualitative psychosociological approach. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 20(2), 336–345.
Lippi, G., Mattiuzzi, C., & Guidi, G. (2003). Prevention of doping in sports: epidemiological issues and ethical implications. Epidemiol Prev, 28, 178–183.
López, S., Meirelles, J., Rayol, V., Poralla, G., N., W., Fadel, B., & Pizzatti, L. (2020). Gene doping and genomic science in sports: where are we? Bioanalysis, 12(11), 801–811.
Lux, D., & Vinther, A. S. (2024). Anti-Doping research: What is left to do? (pp. 1–5).
McLean, S., Naughton, M., Kerhervé, H., & Salmon, P. M. (2023). From Anti-doping-I to Anti-doping-II: Toward a paradigm shift for doping prevention in sport. International Journal of Drug Policy, 115, 104019.
Momaya, A., Fawal, M., & Estes, R. (2015). Performance-enhancing substances in sports: A review of the literature. Sports Medicine, 45(4), 517–531.
Morente-Sánchez, J., & Zabala, M. (2013). Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Medicine, 43, 395–411.
Mutz, M., & Gerke, M. (2024). National pride effects of major sporting events. In Research Handbook on Major Sporting Events (pp. 485–497).
Naughton, M., Salmon, P. M., Kerhervé, H. A., & McLean, S. (2024). Applying a systems thinking lens to anti-doping: A systematic review identifying the contributory factors to doping in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1–15.
Nemtsev, O. B., Bguashev, A. B., Martynova, M. N., Polyansky, A. V., & Mekhrikadze, V. V. (2020). Attitude of students of universities and faculties of physical education and sports of Russia to the problem of doping in sports. Scientific Notes of The Lesgaft University, 5(183), 538–545.
Pantuso, G., & Hvattum, L. M. (2021). Maximizing performance with an eye on the finances: a chance-constrained model for football transfer market decisions. Top, 29(2), 583–611.
Papadopoulos, F. C., Skalkidis, I., Parkkari, J., & Petridou, E. (2006). & “Sports Injuries. European Journal of Epidemiology, 21, 307–313.
Patterson, L. B., Backhouse, S. H., & Lara-Bercial, S. (2019). Examining coaches’ experiences and opinions of anti-doping education. International Sport Coaching Journal, 6(2), 145–159.
Patterson, L. B., Duffy, P. J., & Backhouse, S. H. (2014). Are coaches anti-doping? Exploring issues of engagement with education and research. Substance Use & Misuse, 49(9), 1182–1185.
Petrou, M., Lazuras, L., Hillier, M., & Mojtahedi, D. (2022). Doping behaviour in mixed martial arts athletes: The roles of social norms and self-regulatory efficacy. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(4), 1086–1101.
Pöppel, K., & Büsch, D. (2019). The doping critical attitude of elite sports coaches in combat sports. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 2(49), 168–178.
Rudenko, V. P. (2014). Main modern problems of doping in sport (pp. 53–55).
Scarr, G. (2015). Over 10% of athletes may be doping, WADA director says.
Storm, R. K., & Jakobsen, T. G. (2020). National pride, sporting success and event hosting: An analysis of intangible effects related to major athletic tournaments. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 12(1), 163–178.
Woods, R., & Butler, B. N. (2020). Social Issues in Sport.
Woolway, T., Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., & Petróczi, A. (2020). Doing what is right and doing it right”: a mapping review of athletes’ perception of anti-doping legitimacy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 84, 102865.
Zmuda Palka, M., Bigosińska, M., Siwek, M., Angelova-Igova, B., & Mucha, D. K. (2023). Doping in Sport-Attitudes of Physical Trainers Students Regarding the Use of Prohibited Substances Increasing Performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4574.

Citation

Funding Statement

The preparation of this paper was supported by the Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research, grant number (142–451-3098); Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation, Serbia.

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by