Alexandre M, Obert P, Bonnet P, Courteix D. Effects of socio-economic status on physical activity of prepubescent children. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. 2003. p. 190–203.
2.
Brodersen N, Steptoe A, Boniface D, Wardle J. Trends in physical activity and sedentary behaviour inadolescence: ethnic and socioeconomic differences. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007. p. 140–4.
3.
De Cocker K, Artero E, De Henauw S, Dietrich S, Gottrand F, Béghin L, et al. Can differences in physical activity by socio-economic status in European adolescents be explained by differences in psychosocial correlates? A mediation analysis within the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) study. Public Health Nutrution. 2012. p. 2100–9.
4.
Djordjic V. Proceedings of the interdisciplinary scientific conference with international participation: Anthropological status and physical activity of children and youth. 2006. p. 171–8.
5.
Matic V, R. Anthropological status and physical activity of children and youth. Faculty of Sport and Physical Education; 2008. p. 55–77.
6.
Giulianotti R. Sport: critical sociology. Clio; 2008.
7.
Klein M, Fröhlich M, Pieter A, Emrich E. Socio-economic status and motor performance of children and adolescents. European Journal Of Sport Science. 2016. p. 229–36.
8.
Kuljic R, Matic R, Maksimovic N. Proceedings of Matica Srpska for Social Sciences. 2014. p. 119–28.
9.
Torre L, Masala G, D, De V, Arzano E, Fargione I, et al. Physical activity and Socio-economic status: results of a pilot study. Medicina dello sport. 2003. p. 175–83.
10.
EQOL Journal. 2016. p. 3–8.
11.
Maksimovic N, Matic R. Anthropological status and physical activity of children and youth. Faculty of Sport and Physical Education; 2006. p. 257–64.
12.
Matic R, Jaksic D. Socio-economic characteristics and motor behavior of girls of younger school age [Socio-ekonomske karakteristike i motoričko ponašanje devojčica mlađeg školskog uzrasta. 2007.
13.
Anthropological status and physical activity of children, youth and adults. Faculty of Sport and Physical Education; p. 213–21.
14.
Matic R, Kuljic R, Maksimovic N. Motor behavior and socio-economic environment [Motoričko ponašanje i socio-ekonomsko okruženje. Teme. 2010. p. 1247–60.
15.
Matsudo V, Andrade E, Matsudo S, Araujo T, Guedes J, Andrade D, et al. Changes in Levels of Physical Activity According to Socio-Economic Level, After Five Years of an Intervention Program. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2006. p. 369.
16.
Mayer E. The Influence of Parental Income on Children’s Outcomes, Wellington: Knowledge Management Group. Ministry of Social Development; 2002.
17.
Mollborn S, Lawrence E, James-Hawkins L, Fomby P. When do socioeconomic resources matter most in early childhood. 2013.
18.
Neves R, Araujo T, Cruciani F, Andrade E, Matsudo S, Matsudo V. Impact Of A Five-year Intervention Program On Physical Activity Level Of A Low Socio-economic Region. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2005. p. 248–9.
19.
Rowland T. Adolescence: A “risk factor” for physical inactivity. President’s council on Physical Fitness and Sports. 1999. p. 1–8.
20.
Sallis J, Prochaska J, Taylor W. A Review of Correlates of Physical Activity of Children and Adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000. p. 963–75.
21.
Scheerder J, Vanreusel B, Taks M, Renson R. Social stratification patterns in adolescents’ active sports participation behaviour: a time trend analysis 1969-1999. European Physical Educational Review. 2005. p. 5–27.
22.
Strauss R, Rodzilsky D, Burack G, Colin M. Psychosocial Correlates of Physical Activity in Healthy Children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2001. p. 897–902.
23.
Vandendriessche J, Vandorpe B, Vaeyens R, Malina R, Lefevre J, Lenoir M, et al. Variation in sport participation, fitness and motor coordination with socioeconomic status among Flemish children. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2012. p. 113–28.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
