The pedagogical potential of a bilingual specialized dictionary in tertiary education

Mira Milić ,
Mira Milić

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia,

Filip Sadri ,
Filip Sadri

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia,

Tatjana Glušac
Tatjana Glušac

Union University, Faculty of Law and Business Studies Dr. Lazar Vrkatić, Novi Sad, Serbia,

Published: 01.12.2018.

Volume 11, Issue 1 (2019)

pp. 51-58;

https://doi.org/10.31382/eqol.190606

Abstract

Even though specialized dictionaries provide abundant information, research findings indicate that their role in the teaching process has been neglected. Within the context of the current global domination of English and an increased need for linguistic standardization, special emphasis is placed on the use of specialized dictionaries in teaching vocabulary. With this in mind, the purpose of this research is to analyze pedagogical potential of a specialized bilingual dictionary in function of ESP vocabulary learning and knowledge transfer. A questionnaire-based research into dictionary use in ESP acquisition is conducted with 705 students and 21 teachers of non-linguistic faculties of the University of Novi Sad. The findings indicate that dictionaries are seldom used in the classroom, even though both groups of respondents have positive attitudes towards them, especially online dictionaries and other user-friendly applications. However, the findings also indicate students’ insufficient knowledge not only of lexicographic conventions but also the criteria for dictionary quality assessment. Building on the hypothesis that well-conceived dictionaries can enhance not only ESP teaching but also knowledge transfer from English to non-English languages, this research suggests the importance of compiling quality terminological products and their inclusion into the teaching process with systematic training in dictionary use.

Keywords

References

1.
Agerbo H. The Incorporation of specialised data in lexicographic meaning explanations: A discussion based on sports and fitness terms. Lexicos. 2016. p. 1–35.
2.
Alhaisoni E. The use of dictionaries by Saudi EFL students across educational level and university major. 2008.
3.
Al-Homoud F. Dictionary Use by Saudi EFL University Preparatory Program Students. International Journal of Linguistics. 2017. p. 15–27.
4.
Augustyn P. No dictionaries in the classroom: translation equivalents and vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Lexicography. 2013. p. 362–85.
5.
Béjoint H. Using the Word Web online dictionary in an ESP class. ANALELE UNIVERSITĂłII "DUNĂREA DE JOS. DIN GALAłI FASCICULA XXIVANUL. OUP Catelly, Y-M; 2010. p. 501–7.
6.
Fuertes-Olivera A, Tarp S. The anglicization of European lexis. John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2014.
7.
Hartmann R, R, K. Teaching and researching lexicography. Pearson Education Limited; 2001.
8.
Hartmann R, R, Gregory K, J. Dictionary of lexicography. Routledge; 1998.
9.
Harvey K, Yuill D. A study of the use of a monolingual pedagogical dictionary by learners of English engaged in writing. Applied Linguistics. 1997. p. 253–78.
10.
Lew R, Kosem I, Kallas J, Gantar P, Krek S, M. Proceedings of the eLex 2013 Conference. 2013. p. 16–31.
11.
Milić M. Termini igara loptom u engleskom jeziku i njihovi prevodni ekvivalenti u srpskom, neobjavljena magistarska teza [Ball game terms in English and their translation equivalents in Serbian. Filozofski fakultet; 2004.
12.
Milić M. Englesko-srpski rečnik sportskih termina. Zmaj; 2006.
13.
Milić M. Creating English-based sports terms in Serbian: theoretical and practical aspects. Terminology. 2015. p. 1–22.
14.
Milić M. Leksikologija i leksikografija u svetlu savremenih pristupa: Zbornik naučnih radova. 2016. p. 273–86.
15.
Creation of English-based tennis terms in Serbian. EQOL Journal Exercise and Quality of Life. 2015. p. 31–8.
16.
Milić M, Panić Kavgić O, Kardoš A. Jezici i kulture u vremenu i prostoru VI. Tematski zbornik. 2017. p. 245–56.
17.
Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
18.
Nesi H. Dictionary use by English language learners. Language Teaching. 2013. p. 38–55.
19.
Prćić T. Engleski u srpskom, 2. izd. Filozofski fakultet; 2011.
20.
Prćić T. Building contact linguistic competence related to English as the nativized foreign language. 2014.
21.
System. p. 143–54.
22.
Prćić T. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet. 2018.
23.
Scolfield P. Using the English dictionary for comprehension. TESOL Quaterly. 1982. p. 185–94.
24.
Tarp S. The Pedagogical dimension of the wellconceived specialized dictionary. Ibéica. 2005. p. 7–21.
25.
Tomaszczyk J. Dictionaries: users and uses. Glottodidactica. 1979. p. 103–19.
26.
Vasić V, Prćić T, Nejgebauer G. Do yu speak anglosrpski? Rečnik novijih anglicizama. 3. elektronsko izdanje. Filozofski fakultet; 2018.
27.
Wu J, Wang B. Fourth international conference on ELT in China New Directions in ELT in China. 2004.
28.
Yong H, Peng J, Sadri M, Glušac F, T. The pedagogical potential of a bilingual specialized in tertiary education. Exercise and Quality of Life. John Benjamins Publishing Co; 2007. p. 51–8.
29.
Mla: Milić M, Sadri F, Glušac T. The pedagogical potential of a bilingual specialized dictionary in tertiary education. Exercise and Quality of Life. 2019. p. 51–8.
30.
Chicago: Milić M, Sadri F, Glušac T. The pedagogical potential of a bilingual specialized dictionary in tertiary education. Exercise and Quality of Life. 2019. p. 51–8.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by