The author finds the reason for writing the paper in the current holding of the World Football Championship in Qatar, as one of the biggest sporting events bigger and more significant than the Olympic Games themselves. Often this great global event is seen as the last place where the small can defeat the big, thereby losing the illusion that the rich and the big always win, and that “David can beat Goliath”. Taking the facts into account, football is still primarily a game of the poor, in which the largest number of footballers came from the margins which, according to the author, reflects its greatest social strength. In his work, the author intends to describe and explain the world in which we live through the prism of not only previous championships. It is through the metaphor of football that the author deals with the issue of global order, with the fact that the main issues of this work are more cultural than economic. As the work is of a theoretical nature, the author's intention is to devote special attention to the consideration of physical culture and sport as a factor of socialization within this theoretical analysis, with a special emphasis on the sociology of football.
Allison L. The Global Politics of Sport. Routledge; 2006.
2.
Armstrong R, Giulianotti G. Football Cultures and Identities. 1999.
3.
Andrews D. Manchester United: A Thematic Study. Routledge; 2004.
4.
Beck U. What is Globalization. Polity Press; 2000.
5.
Biti O. The local and global in contemporary sport. Nar. umjetn. 2008. p. 183–97.
6.
Brentin D. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media. Politics. 2013. p. 993–1008.
7.
Brubaker R. Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
8.
Coakley J. Sports in Society: Issues and Controversies. McGraw-Hill; 2007.
9.
Colovic I. Politics of Identity in Serbia Essays in Political Anthropology. New York University Press; 2000.
10.
Fudbal. Srpska strana rata. Beogad: Samizdat B. 2002. p. 456–81.
11.
Delaney T, Madigan T. The Sociology of Sports: An Introduction. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers; 2014.
12.
Eriksen T. Globalization. The Key Concepts. 2007.
13.
Foer F. Moć knjige. 2006.
14.
García B, Welford J. Supporters and football governance, from customers to stakeholders: A literature review and agenda for research. Sport Management Review. 2015. p. 517–28.
15.
Gidens E. Stubovi kulture. 2005.
16.
Giulianotti R. Football. A Sociology of the Global Game. Polity Press; 1999.
17.
Giulianotti R, Robertson R. The globalization of football: a study in the glocalization of the “serious life.” The British Journal of Sociology. 2004. p. 545–68.
18.
Hesketh S. The production of leisure: understanding the social function of football development in China. Globalizations. 2020. p. 1–19.
19.
Kasapinović D. Novi duh srpskog sporta. Novo Vreme; 1942. p. 29.
20.
Klein G. Fudbal kao koreografija. O odnosu između interakcije u igri i improvizacije u plesu. 2012. p. 5–15.
21.
Kovačević I. Film, fudbal i politika. 2020.
22.
Koković D. Sociologija sporta. Sportska akademija; 2000.
23.
Sociologija sporta. Zavod za udžbenike; 2007.
24.
Krsmanović V. Beograd: Fakultet za menadžment u sportu. 2006.
25.
Kuljić R, Koković D. Novi Sad: Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja Univerzitet u Novom Sadu. 2012.
26.
Cooper S. Football against the enemy. Belgrade: Samizdat B92. 2007.
27.
Lalić D. Torcida: pogled iznutra. 1993.
28.
Agm Z.
29.
Mijatov N. Sport u službi socijalizma: Jugoslovensko iskustvo (1945-1953) [Sport in the service of socialism: The Yugoslav experience (1945-1953)]. Beograd: Institut za savremenu istoriju. Čigoja. Or: PhD thesis. 2020.
30.
Milovanović I. Novi Sad: Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja Univerziteta u Novom Sadu. 2017.
31.
Milovanović I, Radenović S. Savremene tendencije u sociologiji sporta: Od konstituisanja do “razmrvljene” discipline [Contemporary tendencies in the sociology of sport: From constitution to. Sociologija. 2020. p. 237–54.
32.
Milovanović I, Radenović S. Sociologija u XXI veku: izazovi i perspektive Departman za sociologiju. Srpsko sociološko društvo. 2018. p. 54–6.
33.
Pavlović P, Vejnović D. Teorija i sociologija sporta, Odabrane teme [Theory and sociology of sport. 2014.
34.
Grafopapir B, Luka.
35.
Ponomarev I. The Social Phenomenon of Game and Sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 1974.
36.
Prodović M, B. Promene vrednosnih orijentacija u Srbiji -provera alternativnih hipoteza na podacima svetske i evropske studije vrednosti za Srbiju u periodu 1995-2010 [Changes in value orientations in Serbiaverification of alternative hypotheses based on the data of the world and European values study for Serbia in the period 1995-2010], Departman za sociologiju, Filozofski fakultet. Srbija; 2020.
37.
Radenović S. Socioloska luca. IX. 42-55. Rebrending of Red Star and Dinamo Sport Societes -A Consequence of Transition and/or Postmodern Chaos? (2021). In: 9th International scientific conference on kinesiology. 2014. p. 533–6.
38.
Radenović S, Milovanović I. Efekti primene fizičke aktivnosti na antropološki status dece, omladine i odraslih, Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja. 2019. p. 28–9.
39.
Radenović S, Savović B. Sociologija, god. LX, br. 2018. p. 670–90.
40.
Sage G. Sport and the Social Sciences. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1979. p. 1–14.
41.
Skembler G. Sport i društvo, istorija, moć i kultura [Sport and society, history, power and culture. 2007.
42.
Vrcan S. Nogomet -politika -nasilje: Ogledi iz sociologije nogometa [Football -politics -violence: Studies in the sociology of football. 2003.
43.
Zec D. Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju. 2011.
44.
Žugić Z. Uvod u sociologiju sporta: sport kao znanstveni i društveni fenomen. 1996.
45.
Zagreb: Fakultet za fizičku kulturu. 2000.
46.
Đorđević I. Obaveza plaćanja naknade za treniranje igrača. 2006. p. 1047–67.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.