THE ROLE OF INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMISSION IN INCLUSIVE PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT

Višnja Ðorðić ,
Višnja Ðorðić

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Tatjana Tubić
Tatjana Tubić

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Published: 02.12.2011.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2011)

pp. 57-66;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL201102067DJ

Abstract

Development of inclusive education model in Serbia, evident during last decade, is in accordance with national strategic documents and corresponding international legislative. Special role in inclusive education development belongs to intradepartmental commissions, established to implement inclusive politics at local level. In paper, the normative framework for intradepartmental commissions work is analyzed, as well as first experiences from Vojvodinaís intradepartmental commissions. According to data submitted by commissionsí coordinators from 30 local communities, the greatest challenge in commissionsí work is implementation of suggested individual plan of support. Problems with implementation could be referred to additional educational support, including physical education as well. In inclusive physical education perspective, the commissioní opinion is invaluable, because it contains a complete insight into childís needs for additional support. Identification of barriers child and its family is faced with, as well as supports they have in educational domain, presents the first step in inclusive teaching planning. Data obtained show that within children referred to commissions boys, primary school children and mentally disturbed individuals, represent a majority.

Keywords

References

1.
Center Y, Ward J. Teachers’ attitudes towards the integration of disabled children into regular schools. Vol. 34, The Exceptional Child. p. 41–56.
2.
Forlin C, Douglas G, Hattie J. Inclusive practices: How accepting are teachers? Vol. 43, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. p. 119–33.
3.
Jovanovic V, Zavisic V, Lazarevic S i J, M. Priruénik za rad interresorne Komisije za procenu potreba za pruzanjem dodate obrazovne, zdravstvene ili socijalne podrske detetu i uzeniku [Intradepartmental Commission for the Evaluation of Giving Additional Education, Health or Social Support to a Child/Student Guide.
4.
Odluka o kriterijumima za razorstavanje dece ometene u razvoju i nacinu rada Komisije za pregled dece ometene u razoju [Decision on criteria of classifying challenged children and medical commission work methods.
5.
Pravilnik o blizim uputstvima za utvrdivanje prava na individualni obrazovni plan, njegovu primenu i vrednovanje [Regulation on Further Instructions for Claiming Rights inIndividual Education Plan, Its Implementation and Merits.
6.
Pravilnik o dodatnoj obrazovnoj, zdravstvenoj i socijalnoj podrsci detetu i uceniku [Additional Child and Student Education, Health and Social Support Regulation.
7.
Rainforth B. Preparing teachers to educate students with severe disabilities in inclusive settings despite contextual constraints. Vol. 25, Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. p. 83–91.
8.
Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education (1994.
9.
Scruggs TE, Mastropieri MA. Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958-1995: a research synthesis. Vol. 63, Exceptional Children. p. 59–74.
10.
Nations U. Universal Declaration on Human Rights.
11.
Nations U. Convention on the Rights of the Child.
12.
Zakon o osnovama sistema obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The low on the fundamentals of the education system.
13.
Nations U. United Nations Millennium Declaration.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by