The purpose of this study was to assess the general level of physical activity (PA) among predominantly Hispanic college population. In addition, the study examined the relationships between the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) constructs and PA. One hundred participants completed the questionnaire in regard to PA and SCT. The results of this study showed that 59% of the sample met recommendations for PA. Furthermore, self-efficacy was the only significant predictor of PA METS, β = .35, p < .01. This study helps understand the relationship between the SCT constructs and PA, suggesting that maintaining the SCT processes will lead to regular PA. Thus, encouraging and targeting PA together with cognitive changes might be of great interest for future research.
Allison KR, Dwyer JJM, Makin S. Self-Efficacy and participation in vigorous physical activity by high school students. Vol. 26, Health Education and Behavior. p. 12–24.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
3.
Sports Medicine AC. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription.
4.
Armstrong CA, Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR. Stages of change, self-efficacy, and the adoption of vigorous exercise: A prospective analysis. Vol. 15, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. p. 390–402.
5.
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.
6.
Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.
7.
Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Vol. 31, Health Education and Behavior. p. 143–64.
8.
Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: How are we doing? How might we do better? Vol. 15, American Journal of Preventive Medicine. p. 266–97.
9.
Baranowski T, Perry CL, Parcel GS. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: Social Cognitive Theory. In: IN: Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. p. 165–84.
10.
Booth ML. Assessment of physical activity: An international perspective. Vol. 71, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. p. 1 14-120.
11.
Bradley C, McMurray R, Harrell J, Deng S. Changes in common activities of 3*d through 10* graders: the CHIC study. Vol. 32, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 2071–8.
12.
Caspersen C, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age. Vol. 32, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 1601–9.
13.
C.D.C. Physical activity trends: United States, 1990-1998. Vol. 50, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. p. 166–8.
14.
Crespo CH, Keteyian SJ, Heath GW, Sempos CT. Leisure-time physical activity among US adults: Results from the third national health and nutrition examinations survey. Vol. 156, Archives of Internal Medicine. p. 93–8.
15.
Douglas KA, Douglas K, Collins JL. Results from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey. Vol. 46, Journal of American College Health. p. 55–66.
16.
Dunn MS, Wang MQ. Effects of physical activity on substance use among college students. Vol. 18, American Journal of Health Studies. p. 126–32.
17.
Glanz K, Lewis RM, Rimer BK. Health Behavior and Health Education.
18.
Haberman S, Luffey D. Weighing in college students’ diet and exercise behaviors. Vol. 46, Journal of American College Health. p. 189–91.
19.
Haskell W, Lee IM, R. PR, Powel KB, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendations for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Vol. 116, Journal of the American Heart Association. p. 1081–93.
20.
Heath EM, Coleman KJ. Adoption and institutionalization of the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health (CATCH) in El Paso, Texas. Vol. 2, Health Promotion Practice. p. 157–64.
21.
Hoerr SL, Bokram R, Lugo B, Bivins T, Keast DR. Risk for disordered eating relates to both gender and ethnicity for college students. Vol. 21, Journal of the American College of Nutrition. p. 307–14.
22.
Hovell M, Sallis J, Hofstetter R, Barrington E, Hackley M, Elder J, et al. Identification of correlates of physical activity among Latino adults. Vol. 16, Journal of Community Health. p. 23–36.
23.
Insel PM, Roth WT. Core Concepts in Health.
24.
Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Sarna S, Koskenvuo M. Relationship of leisure-time physical activity and mortality: The Finish Twin Cohort. Vol. 279, Journal of the American Medical Association. p. 440–4.
25.
Leslie E, Owen N, Salmon J, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Kai Lo S. Insufficiently active Australian college students: perceived personal, social, and environmental influences. Vol. 28, Preventive Medicine. p. 20–7.
26.
Mago. Do ultim Par pose. Predictoric is icey in spraininanty Aspanic.
27.
In: Meeting.
28.
McAuley E. The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. Vol. 15, Journal of Behavioral Medicine. p. 65–88.
29.
McMurray R, Harrell J, Deng S, Bradley C, Cox L, Bangdiwala S. The influence of physical activity, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity on the weight status of adolescents. Vol. 8, Obesity Research. p. 130–9.
30.
Mouton CP, Calmbach WL, Dhanda R, Espino DV, Hazuda H. Barriers and benefits to leisure-time physical activity among older Mexican Americans. Vol. 9, Archives of Family Medicine.
31.
Patrick K, Covin JR, Fulop M. Health risk behaviors among California college students. Vol. 45, Journal of American College Health. p. 265–72.
32.
Petosa RL, Suminski RR, Hortz B. Predicting vigorous physical activity using social cognitive theory. Vol. 27, American Journal of Health Behavior. p. 301–10.
33.
Pratt M, Macera CA, Blanton C. Levels of physical activity and inactivity in children and adults in the United States: current evidence and research issues. Vol. 37, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 526–33.
34.
Rovniak LS, Eileen SA, Winett RA. Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: a prospective structural equation analysis. Vol. 24, Annals of Behavioral Medicine. p. 149–56.
35.
Ryan GJ, Dzewaltowski DA. Comparing the relationships between different types of self-efficacy and physical activity in youth. Vol. 29, Health Education and Behavior. p. 491–504.
36.
Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR. Predictors of adoption and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men and women. Vol. 21, Preventive Medicine. p. 237–51.
37.
Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Vol. 16, Preventive Medicine. p. 825–36.
38.
Sallis JF, Pinski RB, Grossman RM, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behaviors. Vol. 3, Health Education Research. p. 283–92.
39.
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference.
40.
Steinhardt M, Dishman R. Reliability and validity of expected outcomes and barriers for habitual physical activity. Vol. 31, Journal of Occupational Medicine. p. 536–46.
41.
Suminski RR, Petosa R, Utter AC, Zhang JJ. Physical activity among ethnically diverse college students. Vol. 51, Journal of American College Health. p. 75–80.
42.
Health USD, Services H. A report of the Surgeon General: Physical Activity and Health.
43.
V.
44.
Wallace LS, Buckworth J, Kirby TE, Sherman WM. Characteristics of exercise behavior among college students: Application of social cognitive theory to predicting stage of change. Vol. 31, Preventive Medicine. p. 494–505.
45.
Wyse J, Mercer T, Ashford B, Buxton K, Gleeson N. Evidence for the validity and utility of the stages of exercise behavior change scale in young adults. Vol. 10, Health Education Research. p. 365–77.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
