The aim of the study was to determine if and to what extent equal point of view of spouses regarding recreation can be seen as a significant indicator of the quality and stability of marital relationship in our society. For this purpose 436 women, who live in marriage or non-marital cohabitation, aged 19- 64, were tested. The differences among the tested women who share the same attitude about recreation with their spouses and those who do not, were tested by discriminatory analysis regarding the following: different demographic variables, general satisfaction with the marriage and marital relationship, different aspects of the quality of the marital relationship, style of affectional bond, marital locus of control, differences in judgement of personal and spouseís values, presence of stressful events, strategies for overcoming the stress, stability of the marriage and intention to seek professional psychological help. Statistically significant discriminatory factor (rc=0.54; p= 0.00) was obtained which is interpreted as harmonious in contrast to the conflict prone marital relationship. The main conclusion of the research is that the spousal approval of recreation represents a good indicator of general harmony in a marital relationship.
Ade-Ridder L, Brubacker TH. The quality of long-term marriages. In: Family Relationships in Later Life. p. 21–30.
2.
Sage. Belsky J, Pensky E. Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Vol. 12, Marriage & Family Review. p. 133–56.
3.
Belsky J, Lang ME, Rovine M. Stability and change in marriage across the transition to parenthood: A second study. Vol. 47, Journal of Marriage and Family. p. 855–65.
4.
Belsky J, Spanier GB, Rovine M. Stability and change in marriage across the transition to parenthood. Vol. 45, Journal of Marriage and Family. p. 567–78.
5.
Booth A, Johnson D, Edwards JN. Measuring marital instability. Vol. 45, Journal of Marriage and the Family. p. 387–93.
6.
Bradbury TN. Survey of Life Events.
7.
Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR. Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview.
8.
J.A U. Simpson i W.S. In: Attachment Theory and Close Relationships. p. 46–76.
9.
York N, Guilford Press. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocolís too long: Consider the brief COPE. Vol. 4, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. p. 92–100.
10.
Chester R. Children and marital problems. Vol. 2, International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy. p. 5–27.
11.
Cross SE, Madson L. Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Vol. 122, Psychological Bulletin. p. 5–37.
12.
Naguli. Vol. 58, Medicinski pregled. p. 175–9.
13.
Dragiöi„-Labaö S. Primena skale prilagoðenosti dijade (braËnih partnera) u sistemskoj porodiËnoj terapiji alkoholizma. Vol. 50, Sociologija. p. 293–312.
14.
Eurostat. Europe in figures - Eurostat yearbook. p. 220-.
15.
Fincham FD, Bradbury TN, Heaton TB, Blake AM. The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Vol. 49, Journal of Marriage & the Family. p. 797–809.
16.
Jarmaz O. Karakteristike i funkcionalnost braËnih relacija u Vojvodini. Neobjavljeni diplomski rad, Filozofski fakultet.
17.
Karney BR, Bradbury TN. Assessing longitudinal change in marriage: An introduction to the analysis of growth curves. Vol. 57, Journal of Marriage and the Family. p. 1091–108.
18.
Kirsner BR, Figueredo AJ, Jacobs WJ. Self, friends, and lovers: structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values. Vol. 75, Journal of Af ective Disorders. p. 131–48.
19.
Mi„anovi„-Cveji„ é, äakoti„-Kurbalija J, Kurbalija D. Ambivalentna afektivna vezanost u braËnim odnosima. Vol. 41, Psihijatrija danas. p. 43–53.
20.
Mihi„ I. Karakteristike i funkcionalnost braËnih odnosa u porodicama na teritoriji Vojvodine. In: Porodice u Vojvodini: karakteristike i funkcionalnost. p. 80–98.
21.
Nomaguchi KM, Milkie MA. Costs and rewards of children: The effects of becoming a parent on adults. Vol. 65, Journal of Marriage & Family. p. 356–74.
22.
Correlates of subjective global merital satisfaction in women. Vol. 1, Druötvena istraûivanja. p. 41–65.
23.
Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Vol. 38, Journal of Marriage and the Family. p. 15–28.
24.
Kurbalija J, Mi„anovi„-Cveji„ é, Kurbalija. Karakteristike afektivne vezanosti osoba sa depresivnim poreme„ajima. Vol. 42, Psihijatrija danas. p. 157–68.
25.
Terman LM, Buttenwieser P, Ferguson LW, Johnson WB, Wilson DP. Psychological Factors in Marital Happiness.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
