This study compared self reported physical activity (PA) (MET min/week) with pedometer determined PA (steps/day). Participants in this study were 300 adults, (25 - 56 years of age). PA was assessed with the IPAQ long form and the number of steps was assessed with the Yamax model SW-200. Participants wore the pedometer for 7 consecutive days. Data (categorical score) was analyzed using cross-tabs analysis. Two-way ANOVA (gender 2 x level of PA 3) was performed on the number of steps/day. Significant main effect was reported only for the factor ìlevel of PAî with adults in the moderate and the high activity group performing more steps/day than adults in the low PA group. Adults in Greece performed less steps/day than the international recommendations PA suggest even though the majority of them were assigned by IPAQ long form at the moderate and very high PA groups.
Sport Medicine AC. Guidelines for graded exercise testing and prescription.
2.
Sport Medicine AC. Position statement -The recommended quantity and quality of exercise fro developing and maintaining fitness in healthy adults. Vol. 10, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p.
3.
Association AH. Exercise testing and training of individuals with hearth disease of at high risk for development.
4.
Sport Medicine/ American Heart Association A. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association.
5.
Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder S. Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Vol. 28, Geriatric Nursing. p. 339–40.
6.
Basset DR, Ainsworth BE, Leffett SR, Mathien CA, Main JA, Hunter DC, et al. Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Vol. 28, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 1071–7.
7.
Basset DR, Cureton AL, Ainsworth BE. Measurement of daily walking distance-questionnaire versus pedometer. Vol. 32, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 1018–23.
8.
Bouchard C, Blair SN, Haskell WL. Why study physical activity and Health.
9.
In: Physical Activity and Health. p. 4–21.
10.
Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute. In: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute (Eds), Physical Activity and Sport Monitor.
11.
12.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjˆstrˆm M, Bauman AE, L. BM, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Vol. 35, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 1381–139.
13.
Crespo CJ, Keteyian GW, Heath GW, Stempos CT. Leisure time physical activity among US adults. Vol. 56, Archives Internal Medicine. p. 93–8.
14.
Crouter SC, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR. Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Vol. 35, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 1455–60.
15.
Report E. European Union Publications.
16.
Freedson PS, Miller K. Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and hart rate. Vol. 71, Research Quarterly Exercise & Sport. p. 21–9.
17.
Hakim AA, Curb JD, Pertovitch H, Rodrigez BL, Yano K, Ross GW, et al. Effects of walking on coronary heart disease in elderly men: the Honolyly Heart Program. Vol. 6, Circulation. p. 9–13.
18.
Haskell WL. Health consequences of physical activity: understanding and challenges of regarding dose- response. Vol. 26, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 649–60.
19.
Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson R, C. H, G W, Howze E, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Vol. 22, American Journal of Preventive Medicine. p. 73–107.
20.
Le Masurier G, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. Vol. 35, Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise. p. 867–71.
21.
Lee I, Paffenbarger S. Associations of light, moderate, and vigorous intensity physical activity with longevity. Vol. 151, American Journal of. Epidemiology. p. 293–9.
22.
Lee IM, Skerrett P, J. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: What is the dose.
23.
Makavelou P, Michalopoulou M, Makavelou S, Ifantidou S, Kourtesis T, Zetou E. Vol. 3, Age and Gender Effects on Physical Activity in Greek Adults Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education. p. 176–86.
24.
Manson J, E N, S. A, Krolewski M, J. S, J. M, et al. A prospective study of exercise and walking and incidence of diabetes among US males. Vol. 268, Journal of the American Medical Association. p. 63–7.
25.
McCormak M, Giles-Cort AK, Milligan G. Demographic and individual correlates of achieving 10.000 steps/dayQuse of pedometers in a population -based study. Vol. 17, Health Promotion Journal of Australia. p. 43–7.
26.
Macfarlane DJ, Chan D, Chan KL, Ho EY, Lee CC. Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals. Vol. 104, European Journal of Applied Physiology. p. 435–44.
27.
Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY, Chan KL, D C. Convergent validity of six methods to assess physical activity in daily life. Vol. 101, Journal of Applied Physiology. p. 1328–34.
28.
Morris JN, Clayton DG, Everitt MG, Semmence AM, Burgess EH. Exercise in leisure time: Coronary attack and death tares. Vol. 63, British Heart Journal. p. 325–34.
29.
Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. Vol. 273, Journal of the American Medical Association. p. 402–7.
30.
Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel MEH, J. G, S.C., Trambley M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measure for assessing physical activyt in adutlsQ a systematic review. Vol. 5, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. p. 1,24.
31.
Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Vol. 71, Research Quarterly in Exercise & Sport. p. 1–14.
32.
Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Lukajic O, Bassett DR. Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. Vol. 35, Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise. p. 1779–84.
33.
Thune I, Njolstad I, Lochen ML, Forde OH. Physical activity improves the metabolic risk profiles in men and women: the Troms ̄ Study. Vol. 158, Archives of Internal Medicine. p. 1633–40.
34.
Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd P, Masse K, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Vol. 40, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 181–8.
35.
Tudor Locke C, Ainsworth B, Thomson RW, Matthews CE. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measure of free-living physical activity. Vol. 34, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 2045–51.
36.
Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Vol. 34, Sports Medicine. p. 1–8.
37.
Health USD, Services H. Physical Activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General.
38.
Varo JJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Irala-Estevez J, Kearney J, Gibner M, Martinez J, et al. Distribution and determinants of sedentary lifestyles in the European Union. Vol. 32, International Journal of Epidemiology. p. 138–46.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
