RELATIONS BETWEEN ANTHROPOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS AND LATENT DIMENSIONS OF STRENGTH IN PERSONS OF ABOVE-AVERAGE MOTOR ABILITIES

Milan Cvetkoviċ ,
Milan Cvetkoviċ

Faculty of sport and physical education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Damjan Jakšiċ ,
Damjan Jakšiċ

Faculty of sport and physical education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Dejan Orlić
Dejan Orlić

Faculty of sport and physical education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Published: 01.06.2011.

Vol 3, No 1 (2011), 2011, 3 (1);

pp. 41-49;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL201101058C

Abstract

Mere enrollment on the Faculty of Sport and Physical Education assumes that the population has been selected according to several criteria. One of the most typical criteria is motor development, hence students of sport and physical education might be treated as persons of above-average motor abilities. Test battery of 17 anthropometrical tests and 14 strength tests has been applied on the sample of 149 males, students of the Faculty of Sport and Physical Education in Novi Sad. The purpose of this paper is to determine relations between anthropometrical measures and latent dimensions of strength. Within the latent space of strength, after Promax rotation of major components and based on KG criteria, three strength factors have been isolated: static and repetitive strength, especially that of hands and trunk to a lesser degree, explosive strength of legs, and explosive strength of arms. Finaly, three statistically significant canonical correlations have been isolated. The first is that of explosive strength of arms having negative correlation with all anthropometrical variables, the second is explosive strength of legs which is in negative correlation with subcutaneous fat tissue of upper leg and triceps, but in positive correlation with the measures of longitudinal dimensionality of skeleton, whereas the third is static and repetitive strength of arms (and trunk to a lesser degree) being in negative correlation with body height and leg length.

Keywords

References

1.
Cattel RB. Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology.
2.
Cvetkovic M. Effects of different aerobic programs with the students of Faculty of Sport and Physical Education.
3.
Harris CW, Kaiser HF. Oblique factor analytic solutions by orthogonal transformations. Vol. 29, Psychometrika. p. 347–62.
4.
Hendrickson AE, White PO. PROMAX: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Vol. 17, British Journal of Statistical Psychology. p. 65–70.
5.
Jenrich RI, Sampson PF. Rotation to simple loadings. Vol. 31, Psychometrika. p. 313–23.
6.
Kaiser HF. A note on Guttman’s lower bound for the number of common factors. Vol. 14, British Journal of Statistical Psychology. p. 1.
7.
Kurelic N, Momirovic K, Stojanovic M, Sturm J, Radojevic D, Viskic-Stalec N. The structure and development of morphological and motoric dimensions of youth.
8.
Momirovic K. One very stupid method for oblique simple structure transformation: Technical report.
9.
Momirovic K. Intruder in the dust. A liberal criterion for determining the number of significant components.
10.
Momirovic K. A comparison of some methods for oblique simple structure transformation.
11.
Momirovic K, Hosek A, Prot F, Bosnar K. About morphological types of young adult males. Vol. 38, Herald of Anthropological Society of Yugoslavia. p. 29–45.
12.
Priulj D, Pelemis V. Differences in motor abilities and morphological characteristics of the athletes and nonathletes students. Vol. 5, Scientific-expert Journal of Sport and Health. p. 31–8.
13.
Stojanovic M, Momirovic K, VukosavIjevié R, Solaric S. The structure of anthropometric dimensions. Kinesiology. p. 1–2.
14.
J. S, Momirovié K. The total amount of valid variance as a basis of criteria for determining the number of significant principal components. Vol. 1, Kinesiology. p. 91–3.
15.
Viskic-Stalec N. Relations between dimensions of movements regulation and morphological and some dimensions of energy regulation.
16.
Zaciorski VM. The physical properties of an athlete.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles