AN AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS AT HEALTH RISK BASED ON DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SELF-REPORTED PERCEPTIONS

Dejan Magoc ,
Dejan Magoc

Department of Health Studies, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, United States

Tanja Magoc ,
Tanja Magoc

Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, United States

Joe Tomaka
Joe Tomaka

Department of Public Health, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, United States

Published: 01.06.2011.

Volume 3, Issue 1 (2011)

pp. 11-21;

https://doi.org/10.31382/EQOL201101055M

Abstract

The risks of developing diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease could be reduced by increasing the number of individuals receiving adequate levels of physical activity (PA). Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported that about 30% of Americans do not engage in any PA and about 40% engage in some levels of PA, but still not meeting the recommended levels defined by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). Studies have shown that the greatest declines in PA occur during the transitions from high school to college and beyond. Thus, it is important to identify students at young age that are at health risk due to lack of PA, so that specific steps could be taken toward helping these individuals develop a healthier lifestyle. We used data on 100 college students to develop a preliminary computer program (using a backpropagation multilayer neural network approach) to automatically identify individuals at risk of being not sufficiently physically active. Besides various types of demographic variables, data included information on the association between studentsí self-reported levels of PA and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) constructs (e.g., self- efficacy, self-regulation, social support, expectations), as predictors of participation in PA. The results of this study indicated that the backpropagation multilayer neural network identified and classified individuals at risk of being not sufficiently physically active into right categories (atrisk individuals or not at-risk individuals) 77% of the time. Collecting additional data points that contain more at-risk individuals will improve the neural network's prediction of at-risk individuals.

Keywords

References

1.
Booth ML. Assessment of physical activity: An international perspective. Vol. 71, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. p. 114–20.
2.
C.D.C. Trends in leisure-time physical inactivity by age, sex, and race/ethnicity: United States, 1994-2004. Vol. 54, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. p. 991–4.
3.
Dunn MS, Wang MQ. Effects of physical activity on substance use among college students. Vol. 18, American Journal of Health Studies. p. 126–32.
4.
Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH. The WEKA data mining software: an update. Vol. 11, SIGKDD Explorations.
5.
Haskel W, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al.
6.
Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendations for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Vol. 116, Journal of American Heart Association. p. 1081–93.
7.
Magoc D, Tomaka J, Thompson S. Overweight, obesity and strong attitudes: Predicting participation in physical activity in a predominantly Hispanic college population. Vol. 69, Health Education Journal. p. 427–38.
8.
Mounton CP, Calmbach WL, Dhanda R. Barriers and benefits to leisure-time physical activity among older Mexican Americans. Vol. 9, Archives of Family Medicine. p. 892–7.
9.
Petosa RL, Suminski RR, Hortz B. Predicting vigorous physical activity using social congnitive theory. Vol. 27, American Journal of Health Behavior. p. 301–10.
10.
Pratt M, Macera CA, Blanton C. Levels of physical activity and inactivity in children and adults in the United States: Current evidence and research issues. Vol. 31, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. p. 526–33.
11.
Rovniak LS, Eileen SA, Winett RA. Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: A prospective structural equation analysis. Vol. 24, Annals of Behavioral Medicine. p. 149–56.
12.
Rusell S, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence, a modern approach.
13.
Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Vol. 16, Preventive Medicine. p. 825–36.
14.
Sallis JF, Pinski RB, Grossman RM, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behavior. Vol. 3, Health Education Research. p. 283–92.
15.
Tan P, Steinbach M, Kumar V. Introduction to data mining.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by